PC 011106 - Laserfiche WebLink

ROLL CAI f AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: RECUSED: ABSENT: ,L VOTE: Commissioners Arkin, Fox, Maas, Peazce, and Roberts None. None. None. Commissioner Blank. Resolution No. PC-2006-01 was entered and adopted as motioned. b. PUD-99-14, Kazuo Hatsushi Work session to review and provide comments on an application for PUD development plan approval for 13 new and one existing single-family detached residential units on an approximately 15-acre site located at 2756, 2770, and 2798 Vineyazd Avenue in the Vineyazd Avenue Corridor Specific Plan Area. Zoning for the property is PUD-LDR and OS (Planned Unit Development -Low Density Residential and Open Space) District. Ms. Decker presented the staff report and detailed the scope, layout, and history of the project. She noted that a bound volume containing the information about the project was distributed to each Commissioner. She displayed the site map and described the road, lot layout, and proposed phasing. She noted that there was a temporary permit for stockpiling materials for the Beratlis project in effect. Commissioner Maas questioned the accessibility of the proposed open space and use by the general public. She asked whether there would be signs posted. She asked further is there were signs posted at Kottinger Ranch that the public was not allowed to use the land, Mr. Roush replied that the Kottinger Hills subdivision has an area that is designated not for public use. He explained that preserved the rights of the subdivision owners so that if people did use it, they could not claim prescriptive rights to use the property. He believed that as a practical matter, the public probably did use it, but the homeowners association retained the rights to say that there were no prescriptive rights by the public. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Mori Hatsushi, applicant, 80 S. Buchanan Circle, Pacheco, noted that he was the son of the owners of the property. He noted that last yeaz mazked the fiftieth year of his father's arrival in the United States, 35 years of which he had spent in Pleasanton. He described the background of the project and noted that they held a meeting with the neighbors. He noted that there was support for the project, and that they should be able to address any problems or concerns. Ralph Hughes, applicant, noted that he was the son-in-law of Kazuo Hatsushi and noted that there were two phases to the project because there were existing leases with businesses in the northern end of the site noted as Phase 2 on the plans. Because of those leases, one side of the site would not be available to be developed for approximately PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 11, 2006 Page 4 of 19