My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
22
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
071707
>
22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/11/2007 11:54:12 AM
Creation date
7/11/2007 11:54:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
7/17/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Nick Powers, 3697 Locke Court -fourth grader Nick Powers advised that he was a member of the Tri- <br />Valley Hockey team, and supported having Sharks build a facility in Pleasanton. <br />John Carroll, 2981 Moreno Avenue -felt the proposed Sharks facility was more than should be <br />accomodated on the property. He discussed planned trails for the area, and the benefits the parks facilities <br />would offer to seniors living in the senior facility close to the park, i.e. bocce courts. Mr. Carroll <br />encouraged the Commission to consider earlier comments from the Audubon Society, and was encouraged <br />with the flexibility offered in the redesign. <br />Dan Faustina, 1405 Calle Enrique -was excited about the Sharks proposal for the youth of Pleasanton. <br />Mr. Faustina advised that he represented the Pleasanton Junior Football League, and was concerned with <br />the fact that his organization has had to cut two (2) teams because of a lack of the available fields. He <br />encouraged the Commission to consider including football/lacrosse fields in the park, and believed that <br />approximately 1.8 acres would be needed to achieve that goal. <br />Chairperson Ellgas discussed with staff the possibility of including multi-use, all-weather lit fields, and <br />the scheduling of such fields. <br />Susan Spitzer, 4250 Diavila Avenue -questioned whether the Sharks facility would be a local or regional <br />facility, and indicated that she would prefer the park be for the use of Pleasanton residents. She indicated <br />support for soccer fields and a dog exercise area. Ms. Spitzer also felt that a Sharks facility would bring <br />unwanted traffic into the City. <br />Patricia Vicary and Jean Fahmie, 5133 Independent Drive -provided information about the St. Moritz Ice <br />Skating Club, of which they are members. They agreed that the Sharks facility would be a regional <br />facility, but felt that it would benefit the City. They asked the Commission to support including the ice <br />facility in Staples Ranch Community Park. <br />Allen Roberts, 16 Grey Eagle Court -discussed how facilities in Pleasanton offer benefits to children, and <br />encouraged the Commission to consider adding the Sharks facility. Mr. Roberts felt that the facility <br />would be an enormous asset to Pleasanton, while also benefiting the region. He stated that the Sharks <br />were ahigh-class organization, and would make this facility atop-class operation. <br />Dan Maslana, 4250 Diavila Avenue -felt that the Sharks facility was going to be the main focus of <br />Staples Ranch Community Park. Mr. Maslana indicated that he was not against the Sharks proposal, but <br />asked the Commission to consider other options. He felt that senior activities for the park should be kept <br />in mind, as should a dog exercise area and access to the Arroyo Mocho trail. <br />Drew Burns, 1137 Via di Salerno -advised that he has played ice hockey for over 30 years, and felt the <br />Sharks would build a world class facility. He discussed Logitech Ice in San Jose, and thought such a <br />facility in Pleasanton would be a win-win situation. <br />Stuart Cooke (Alameda County) 224 W. Winton -advised that Alameda County supports the realignment <br />of the Staples Ranch property, which would benefit access to the area. Mr. Cooke further discussed <br />removal of the berm, green buffer area, trees, an old farmhouse, and trail complexities. <br />Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes <br />March 1, 2007 <br />Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.