My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
22
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
071707
>
22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/11/2007 11:54:12 AM
Creation date
7/11/2007 11:54:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
7/17/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
David Block, 8506 Lupine Court - read a prepared statement advising that he has a strong interest in an <br />ice skating facility being built in the Tri-Valley. He also discussed the benefits of recreational exercise, <br />and national obesity problems. <br />Rich Cimino, 1281 Ridgewood Road - as a representative for the Audubon Society, he was very <br />interested in green space for the park. He would prefer to see it as a continuous area, and not as proposed <br />by the Sharks. He discussed plans for saving trees in the area. Mr. Cimino indicated that he was not <br />opposed to a Sharks facility being built in Pleasanton, but would like to see certain entities kept in the <br />park. <br />Commissioner Pentin questioned Mr. Fulford about whether trees in the proposed area were heritage trees, <br />and was advised that this was something that would be reviewed at the next stage of the process. <br />Judith Geiselman, 2602 Glen Isle Avenue -felt that the Sharks proposal was a major commercial activity <br />and not a park amenity. She would prefer to see the Sharks facility in a commercial area. Ms. Geiselman <br />had several questions and concerns, including: 1) what had been done to validate this as a community- <br />wide need; 2) how many Pleasanton residents would use such a facility; 3) financial responsibility by the <br />City for sales; 4) having a commercial entity in a community park; and 5) need for a community center. <br />Greg_Visscher, 2508 Wilde Avenue -encouraged the Commission to consider appropriate Arroyo Mocho <br />trail improvements as part of the approval process. Mr. Visscher discussed access to the trail, and felt that <br />some of the development costs should be assessed to the developers. <br />Commissioner Kummer discussed with Mr. Visscher paving costs for this portion of the trail. Mr. <br />Visscher advised the costs would run approximately $50/linear foot, a total of approximately $850,000. <br />Leonard Cooper, 6923 Lassen Street -advised that he was President of the Pleasanton Community Tennis <br />Club, which supports the inclusion of tennis courts in Staples Ranch Community Park. Mr. Cooper <br />reviewed the National Guidelines information provided by staff and advised that, based on this <br />information, the City falls shorts on tennis courts, especially lighted courts. He requested that the <br />Commission consider 4-6 tennis courts for the park, indicating that 2-acres would be needed for up to six <br />(6) courts. <br />Carolyn Ainsworth, 3271 Flemington Court - as a tennis player, Ms. Ainsworth felt strongly that tennis <br />courts should be included in the plans for the community park. She strongly urged the Commission to <br />consider lighted courts for the park. <br />John Cligny, 3435 Gravina Place -representing the soccer community. He advised that while the soccer <br />groups support the Sharks proposal, they are concerned with the reconfiguration. It appears that the <br />revised plan might eliminate uses for the remaining acreage. Mr. Cligny discussed possible funding <br />support for fields in the park, and encouraged the Commission to consider including two (2) all-weather lit <br />fields, and six (6) tennis courts. <br />Cele Gutierrez, 3590 Churchill Court -asked the Commission to consider including a dog exercise area in <br />the community park plan. Ms. Gutierrez noted that including a dog exercise area in the park would help <br />achieve the City's goal of having a facility in each quadrant of the City. <br />Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes <br />March I , 2007 <br />Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.