02/26/69 - Laserfiche WebLink

It is their plan to service the market area approximately in the south half of the Bay. A program is also being planned to rehabilitate the land, in other words, they will over a period of time occasionally reseed the land with grass and ultimately plan to return the property to the "A" District, and then sell it as an agricultural enterprise. Thin matter has been discussed by the Valley Planning Committee, who have not, as yet, made a final report, pending a decision by the Regional Parks District. Apparently the Regional Parks people have hired a consultant to handle this matter and plan to have a report by the first of March. After the report is final, the Valley Planning Committee plane to invite the Utah Construction and Mining representatives to make their presentation to that committee. The conservationists will also be invited to present their arguments. Commissioner Carrigan felt that the Planning Commission of the City of Pleasanton should also study this matter and take a stand, but felt that this should not be done until the report from the East Bay Regional Parks was available. In this regard, Commissioner Carrigan motioned, seconded by Commissioner Arnold, that this matter be pursued again at the March 12, 1969 meeting of the Commission. The Commissioners all concurred with this motion. 11.REFERRALS FROM CITY COUNCIL a. UP-68-11. Pentecostal Church of God Referral from City Council to Planning Commission for additional conditions attached to this application if it were approved by the Cosmission. Acting Secretary Aiello read the Planning Department staff report. The situation is hypothetical, but should the Council deem it proper to approve this application, then they would need certain conditions for approval. These conditions were as follows: 1. That the permit is granted for the property as described in the application and any attachments thereto, and as shown on the attached plan labeled Exhibit A. 2. That the applicant moat provide a landscaping visual and audio buffer between his proposal and the adjacent properties. Thin may include but is not limited to solid fencing, dense shrubbery, etc. 3. That the parking area and sold use be illuminated by low-level lighting as approved by the Commission. 4. That the parking required be pursuant to Section 15.102.4a of Article 15 of Zoning Ordinance. 5. That the applicant provide a method of soundproofing the existing structure. 6. That the Council impose the condition that the permit not be transferable to any other party but the Pentecostal Church of God. In addition to these recommendations, the Planning Commission would also like to include a memo from the Public Works Department in support of the Commission's position and for further clarification of the situation involved in permitting said use. - 5 -