|
,~, .-.
<br />BESOLUTION N0. 872
<br />~~5, the application of the Planning Commission for an
<br />amendment to Article 17, Zoning Ordinance No. 520
<br />regarding the prohibiting of A-board signs, has come
<br />before this Coomission,
<br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of
<br />Pleasanton, at the request of the City Attorney,
<br />hereby continues said application until the next
<br />regular meeting on March 26, 1969.
<br />d. Article_22, Sec. 22.104 and 22 104a
<br />Resolution to amend Zoning Ordinance No. 520, Sec. 22.104 title section and 22.104a
<br />by adding the words, "or Sign" in the title section after the word, "Structure;"
<br />and the words, "or in the case of signs with any of the requirements of Article 17
<br />hereof" after the words, "in which the structure is located..." in Section 22.104a.
<br />Chairman Plato opened the Public Hearing. Planning Director Castro stated that the
<br />memorandum prepared by the City Attorney was the result of the problem which
<br />developed regarding the sign erected by Sunset East, which came within the City
<br />limits after the annexation and which was in existence prior to it. The City
<br />Attorney felt it was necessary to amend the ,ordinance to straighten out situations
<br />such as this.
<br />The Commissioners concurred with this line of thinking and upon motion of Commissioner
<br />Carrigan, seconded by Commissioner Arnold, the Public Hearing was closed.
<br />Upon motion of Commissioner Carrigan, seconded by Commissioner Antonini, and carried,
<br />the following resolution was unanimously adopted.
<br />RESOLUTION N0. 873
<br />WHEREAS, the application of the Planning Commission to amend
<br />Article 22 (Title Section), and Sec. 22.104a, has
<br />come before this Commission,
<br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of
<br />Pleasanton hereby amends said Article 22 (Title Section)
<br />to read as follows: "Section 22.104. Restoration of
<br />a Damaged Structure or Sisn," and, Section 22.104a to
<br />read as follows: "a. Whenever a structure or sign
<br />which does not comply with the standards for front yard,
<br />side yards, rear yard, height of structures, distances
<br />between structures, courts, or usable open space
<br />prescribed in the regulations for the district in which
<br />the structure is located, or in the case of eirtna, with
<br />anv of the requirements of Article 17 hereof..."
<br />9. TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAPS
<br />a. Tentative Tract Mao ~k3102
<br />Application of MacKay 6 Sompa for approval of Tentative Tract Map X3102.
<br />Chairman Plato opened the Public Hearing, and Mr. Castro, Planning Director, stated
<br />that in reviewing the tentative map, it was noted by both the Planning and Public
<br />Works Departments that no major changes were being requested or were required,
<br />consequently, approval was being recoamended.
<br />He made reference to the 20 conditions of the Public Works Department and the four
<br />from the Planning Department.
<br />Mr. Castro also mentioned that the Zoning Ordinance does allow an option on either
<br />submitting a complete final development plan for the entire project or to have it
<br />brought in in phases. However, the landscaping plans must be submitted with the
<br />final phase of the entire development.
<br />- 3 -
<br />
|