04/23/69 - Laserfiche WebLink

A -~ The sales price will be the same as those for the other homes in Pleasanton Meadows. Mr. Oakes also explained the methods that cen be employed to maintain the common green areas, and is agreeable to any recommendations which the City Attorney may suggest for the maintenance program. Mr. Arthur Gully, 4119 Suffolk Way, member of the Pleasanton Meadows Homeowners Association, was present and stated his objections. He stated that it was distress- ing to the homeowner to discover after purchasing a home in a PUD District, that the plan is being changed so radically. There being no further comments, upon motion of Commissioner Antonini, seconded by Commissioner Gibbs, and carried, the Public Hearing was closed. Commissioner Gibbs inquired whether a PUD can legally be changed after it has been approved. The City Attorney replied that it could. Commissioner Gibbs feels that the City should be receptive to change and that he personally likes the concept. Commissioner Arnold felt that a strong stand should be taken regarding the changing of a PUD. He inquired about the increase in the number of lots and received a reply of from 53 to 69. He is also against the "alleys" as defined on the plane. Commissioner Arnold again stated that he felt the Commission should keep a strong line in order to keep from becoming very vulnerable as far as changes within a PUD are concerned. Ca®isaioner Antonini shared the feelings of Commissioner Arnold, and is opposed to this concept. Chairman Plato felt that this concept is workable, and that it would be preferable to experiment with a smaller area to test out its success than to build large areas. Upon motion of Commissioner Arnold, seconded by Commissioner Antonini, a resolution that PUD-69-2 be denied was offered and recg4ved the following vote: Ayes - Commissioner Antonini, Commissioner Arnold Noes: Commissioners Carrigan, Gibbs and Chairman Plato This resolution failed to pass by a majority vote. There was further discussion regarding the "alleys", and Mr. Oaken reiterated that every portion of land outside of the homes themselves will be maintained by the Association. Upon motion of Commissioner Gibbs, seconded by Chairman Plato, and carried, the following resolution was offered: RESOLUTION N0. 890 A resolution of the Planning Commission of the city of Pleasanton, recommending to the City Council the approval of PUD-69-2, filed by Amador Valley Investors. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Pleasanton has considered the petition filed by Amador Valley Investors to amend Article 13, Sec.12.108, as per Exhibit A, said amendment located on that property described as follows: - 2 -