06/11/69 - Laserfiche WebLink

d. Article 2. Sec. 2.102a Application of the Planning Commission for an amendment to Zoning Ordinance No. 520 regarding Sec. 2.102a, regarding front yard setbacks. Chairman Garrigan opened the Public Hearing. Due to a lack of time in preparing the necessary exhibits and proper language for this amendment, the Planning Director requested a continuance of this item. Upon motion of Commissioner Antonini, seconded by Commissioner Pereira, and carried, the Public Hearing was continued. Upon motion of Commissioner Antonini, seconded by Commissioner Pereira, and carried, the following resolution was unanimously adopted. RESOLUTION N0. 911 WHERRAS, the application of the Planning Commission for an amendment to Zoning Ordinance No. 520 regarding front yard setbacks, has come before this Co®isaion, NOW, THERBFORE BB IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of Pleasanton hereby continues said item to June 25, 1969, to permit further time for preparation of the proper language and the necessary exhibits. c. RZ-69-10, D. & V. Builders. Inc. Application to rezone from the A (Agricultural) District to the RM-2500 (Multiple Family) District that property generally located ea et of Hopyard Road and south of the Del Valle Parkway, said property containing 22.77 gross acres, more or leas, and described in Assessor's Map Book 946, Page 3375, Parcel 2-2 (Public Hearing continued from May 28, 1969). Chairman Garrigan opened the Public Hearing. The Planning Director stated that he had no additional comments to offer regarding this application. Would reaffirm recommendation that if the Commission is so disposed to modify the application to the PUD, it is proper to do so as the area is zoned for multiples in the General Plan. Mr. Dudley Frost, representing the applicant, demonstrated on the General Plan the area in question. Mr. Frost took into consideration the suggestion of the Planning Director and the City Attorney to attempt to find some reasonable way to develop it as a PUD. He felt there was no feasible way to do this. Mr. Frost feels that he is justified in developing this area in the RM-2500. Now that the homes close by are being sold, it is the correct time to start processing this parcel. He still supports the staff report that this item be approved as submitted. Commissioner Antonini felt the parcel should be rezoned to the PUD, as did Commissioner Pons and Chairman Garrigan. Upon motion of Commissioner Antonini, seconded by Chairman Garrigan, and carried, the Public Hearing was closed. Upon motion of Chairman Garrigan, seconded by Commissioner Antonini, and carried, the following resolution was offered: RESOLUTION N0. 912 A resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Pleasanton, recommending to the City Council the approval of Zone Change No. 69-10, filed by D. 6 V. Builders, Inc. - 3 -