08/13/69 - Laserfiche WebLink

._ -. Mr. George Oakes, representing the applicant, then addressed the Commission, advising them that the matter before them was a matter of housekeeping. In the course of the expiration of the old maps, they had met with City Council and established the agreement for the 1,218 units for the Fairlands tract. The State had required a portion of that area for a frontage road and in so doing, had taken a considerable portion of the multiple development as originally planned. Mr. Oakes informed the Commission that this would be the last extension of this map. The approximate amount of square footage would be 2,000 sq.ft. of land per unit. Mr. Oakes made reference to Gulfstream Street and felt that this alignment should not be continued up to the frontage road. It was Mr. Oakes' opinion that the discontinuance of Gulfstream Street to the frontage road parallel to ~k580, would be eliminated with the improvement of the easterly adjoining property when it develops. Mr. Oakes further stated that in his opinion if Martin Avenue were to be continued north on the easterly adjoining property, that that alignment, coupled with Fairlands Drive and West Iss Positas Boulevard, would provide the necessary access to Santa Rita Road or Interstate 1580. Mr. Robert Pearson was in attendance and spoke in opposition of this rezoning application. Firstly, he inquired of the staff if this application was a PUD amendment. The answer was affirmative. He then inquired about the necessity of a preliminary development plan. Mr. Pearson inquired after the agreement made between the City and the developer where it states the developer could utilize all 1,218 units. The City Attorney replied that he was not aware of any such document. Mr. Oakes then advised the Commission that an original resolution was approved by Council in 1964 and that he had copy of this information together with a letter from the City Manager stating this fact. Mr. Pearson then refuted the claim to the 1,218 units. He made reference to the fact that this was the third rezoning application in the Fairlands development since he moved into the area. Another cause of dissension was the matter of the access road to the freeway. Mr. Oakes again stated his reasons for the discontinuation of Gulfstream Street. It is planned to have Martin Avenue run from Mohr Avenue up to the extension of Fairlands Drive, connecting to the frontage road and thence to the highway. Mr. Oakes feels that Martin Avenue should connect with another street running up to the frontage road. Mr. Alan Campbell disagreed. Chairman Garrigan felt that preliminary development plans should be submitted at this stage before the Commission could proceed in the matter. Upon motion of Chairman Garrigan, seconded by Commissioner Pons, the Public Hearing was continued. Upon motion of Chairman Garrigan, seconded by Commissioner Pons, and carried, the following resolution was adopted unanimously. RESOLUTION N0. 934 WHEREAS, the application of First Pleasanton Investors to rezone by amendment to the original P.U.D. from the RM-2500 and R-1-6500 Districts to the C-F and RM-2000 District, that property described as Parcel 2-9 of Assessor's Map Book 946, Block 1101, containing 11.7 acres, more or Leas, and a portion of Parcel 6, Assessor's Map Book 99-B, Block 395D, Page 1, containing 9.1 acres more or less, or more commonly known as that property immediately south of Highway 1580 and east..6f Tassajara Road, Pleasanton, has come before this Commission, - 4 -