06/01/61 - Laserfiche WebLink

b. The Circumstances required by Section 19.1003 of said Ordinance do exist. 2. The Variance is hereby granted. 3• A copy of this Resolution shall be sent to interested parties. RESOLUTION id0. 152 Whereas, the application of F. J. Leonardo d; Son, for a Variance from Sideyard setback requirements of Section 6.5, Ordinance Ido. 309, to allow construction on a dwelling on property located at 375 Christina Court, in an R-1 (Single Family Residential) District, having come before this Commission June 1, 1961, under Ordinance No. 309, Zoning Ordinance, as amended, the Planning Commission does here- by resolve as follows: 1. The Planning Covm~ission does find as follows: a. notice has been given as required by law. b. The Circumstances required by Section 19.1003 cf said Ordinance do exist. 2. The Variance is hereby granted. 3• A copy of this Resolution shall be sent to interested parties. RESOLUTION pro. 153 Yrhereas, the application of F. J. Leonardo is Son, for a Variance from sideyard setback requirements of Section 6.5, Ordinance No. 309, to allow construction on a dwelling, on property located at 342 Christina Court, in an R-1 (Single Family Residential) District, have come before this Commission June 1, 1961, under Ordinance 110. 309, Zoning Ordinance, as amended, the Planning Commission does here- by resolve as follows: 1. The Planning Commission does find as follows: a. ;Iotice has been given as required by law. b. The Circumstances required by Section 19.1003 of said Ordinance do exist. 2. The Variance is hereby granted. 3. A copy of this Resolution shall be sent to interested parties. On motion of Commissioner Allison, seconded by Commissioner Inzano, and approved by all Commissioners present, the Date of June 15th was set for a Public Hearing for a Conditional Use Permit on Application of Eugenio Gordillo. Secretary Fales read a memo from City Engineer Sypher, pertaining to a re- hearing of a Variance applied for by John J. Amaral in June of 1960. Since the granting~of a 2' Variance, instead of the requested 4' Variance, was based on the Engineer s interpretation of the building Code, and that interpretation being de- termined in error,aflter more careful scrutiny by the Engineer, and application for the full 4' Variance was reapplHed for and a re-hearing was set for June 15, 1961 on motion of Commissioner Landon, seconded by Commissioner Hanifen and approved by all Commissioners present.