05/02/63 - Laserfiche WebLink

The Next item on the agenda was formal consideration by the Planning Commiaei8n of the Tentative Subdivision Map for Tract No. 2473, and consideration of the City Engineer's report to the Commission regarding Tract No. 2473, dated April 30, 1963, which was submitted in accordance with Section 4.03, Ordinance No. 358. A copy of this report is made a part of these minutes. City Engineer Campbell presented hie report, specifically listing the following changes from the Tentative Map se submitted, and pertaining particularly to the limited area recommended for approval. 1. Street Classifications: a. Pleasanton-Suno1 P.oad - Major thoroughfare with frontage road, Type B, frontage road width increased to provide 33 feet between curbs - for frontage shown on Tentative Map. b. San Miguel Court = Cul-de-sac, under 300' long, Type B. c, San Carlos way - Residential Collector, Type A, lots backing up to cemetery to be shortened to accommodate increased street width.. 2. Street Names a, Change Pleasanton Boulevard to Sunol Boulevard. b. Change Minnie Street to Hillview Avenue. c. The following street name designations are recommended: (1) Dolores Street to Drive. (2) Sonoma Street to Drive. (3) San Juan Drive to Way, (4) San Carlos 47ay to Drive. (5) San Antcaio Drive to R_ad. 3. Gradinr~ Plane "Grading plans for each final map area should be submitted for approval with improvement plane." Mr. Fairfield stated he would like to see grading plans only for streets with certain percentage of grade, and not for each lot. Mr. Campbell said he considered that a reasonable request, and the City would probably not require a grading plan for each lot, but a general grading plan, Chairman Landon said the requirement for a general overall grading plan ie reasonable and that even hillside lots would not need extensive grading if imagination is used in house construction. City Engineer Campbell suggested if there is over a SY hillside grade, a detailed grading plan would need to be sub- mitted, Mr. Fales said a standard should be formulated subsequent to ap- proval of this map. Chairman Landon stated that for the future something should be put in writing se a standard requirement, but for this develop- ment grading plans be submitted to a degree required by the City Engineer. 4. ~ecifications and Standard Details are the City Engineer's responsibility, but can be modified by the Planning Co~i.aeion if it so desires, 7. I,ot Dimensions "The lots on the north aide of Mission Drive with excessive depth will re- quire a modification as provided by Article 9 of Ordinance No. 358." 11. Pronertv Line Radius for Cul-de-sacs "Radius on Cul-de-sacs may be reduce3 where Type "B" street sectlons are used so that property line on cul-da.sac will be at back of sidewalk, with 8~ public service easement. This will requiro a modification as provided by Article 9 of Ord. No. 358." 12. Storm Drainase. Mr. Fairfield indicated a desire for a separate agreement on this matter rather than have it be part of the subdivision agreement, 13. Reductlon of Area Covered by Tentative Maa "Ia view of recent developments and concern over school sites, it is recommended that approval of this Tentative Map be Limited to the area indicated on Exhibit 'A". Conditions of approval should provide that inclusion of a different public school site must recognize and provide equivalent park facilities in keeping with the original intent of the Annexation Agreement dated March 4, 1963, and the Planned Unit Develop- ment approved development plane which are a part of said agreement."