|
Chaizm~n Landon opened the public heating on the application of the Planning Com-
<br />mission for an amendment to Ordinance No. 309, assigning zoning districts to the
<br />area of Annexation No. 22, Pleasanton-Sunol Annex "B". Mr. Fales pointed out the
<br />zoning designations on a map of the property, Said map is made a part of these
<br />minutes and is attached hereto. It was agreed the service stations be zoned C-T,
<br />rather than C-N, in order that there would not be a conflict with regard to mini-
<br />mum acreage. However, in a Planned Unit Development there is flexibility allowable
<br />in zoning, according to City Attorney Struther, and Mr, Falea quoted from Section
<br />19.806 of Ord, No. 309 which corroborated this fact. There being no comments from
<br />the audience, Chairman Landon declared the public hearing closed. Mr, Falea stated
<br />that when application for Planned Unit Development approval is made and approved
<br />by, the Commission, by mutual agreement of the developer and the Commission a time
<br />schedule of improvements may be submitted with the understanding of the ultimate
<br />time limit of the building program of the entire planned unit development, and
<br />this may be made a condition of approval. The ordinance states building Est be
<br />started within six months. The Commission has established an outer limit in peat
<br />instances. If a change does take place for the areas of the school and park, this
<br />can be accomplished at the time of formal application for a Zoning Permit for S1te
<br />Plan and Architectural Approval. The park must be adjacent to the school, If the
<br />school fa moved, then the park will be moved, Upon motion of Commissioner Rega,
<br />seconded by Commissioner Antonini, the following resolution was unanimously adopted,
<br />RESOLUTION N0, 216
<br />WHEREAS, Annexation No. 22, Pleasanton-Sunol Annex "B", has been completed
<br />and this area is now within the jurisdiction of the City; and
<br />WHEREAS, the provisions of Ordinance No. 309 regarding the assignment of
<br />zoning designations to newly annexed areas have been complied
<br />with by application of the City Planning Commission;
<br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
<br />RESOLVED, that the City Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City
<br />Council that Ordinance No. 309 be amended to provide the follow-
<br />ing zoning to the area involved:
<br />1, R-1 63.9 acres (gross)
<br />2. A 30.6 acres (gross)
<br />3. R-2 3,6 acres (net)
<br />4. RG-15 5,9 acres (net)
<br />5. RG-25 11,6 acres (net)
<br />6. C-N 9.4 acres (net)
<br />7, C-0 1,3 acres (net)
<br />8. C-T 1,0 acres (net)
<br />9. I-P 6,5 acres (net)
<br />10. Churches (P.-1) 5.7 acres (net)
<br />11. School (R-1) 9.2 acres (net)
<br />12. Park (P.-1) 4.5 acres (net)
<br />The next item on the agenda was the application of Mr. H.B, Haueo, 680 Main St „
<br />for a Zoning Permit in order to move an existing bakery operation from 541 Main
<br />St „ in a C-C District, to 680 Main St „ in a C-C District. Mr, Falea explained
<br />that Mr. Haueo desires to move his bakery to the quarters formerly occupied by
<br />the Post Office. In view of the fact that this is a removal of an existing opera
<br />tion from one building to another within the same Zoning District and with no
<br />extensive expansion or remodeling of the new location, it does meet the standards
<br />of the Zoning Ordinance in this case. The staff recommended the Zoning Permit be
<br />issued. Upon motion of Commissioner Antonini, seconded by Commissioner Wipfli,
<br />the following resolution was unanimously adopted:
<br />RESOLUTION N0, 217
<br />WHEREAS, the application of Mr. H.B. Haueo, 680 Maia Street, for a Zoning
<br />Permit in order to move an existing bakery operation from 541
<br />Main Street; in a GC District, to 680 Main Street, in a C-C District, has
<br />come before this Commission;
<br />NOW, THEREFOREy BE IT
<br />RESOLVED, that the City of Pleasanton Planning Commission does hereby
<br />giant said Zoning Permit.
<br />
|