02/20/64 - Laserfiche WebLink

1. That the facto justifying the above findings remain sub- stantially the same. 2. The applicant show continued financial ability to carry out the proposed Planned Unit Development, with construction to start not later than six months fallowing subdivision approval and precise zoning district classification. 3. Said Planned Unit Development be completed within seven years. 4. A performance bond of not more than 10~ of the estimated coat will not be required at this time, provided that the Planning Commission reserves the right to fi:t and demand such a bond at a later date. The next item on the agenda was consideration of Tentative Subdivision Map, Tract No. 2591 under Ordinance No. 358, the Subdivision Ordinance. After considerable discussion by the Co®isaion and repreaentativea of the developers, upon motion of Commissioner Antonini, seconded by Coa®i.eaioner Lozano, the following zeaolution was unanimously adopted: RESOLUTION N0. 270 RBSOLVEDe The Tentative Subdivision Map for Tract No. 2591 having come before the Pleasanton Planning Commission, as provided by Ordinance No. 358, is horeby approved, with the following modifications and couciiticno: Sae "Conditions of Approval of Tentative Map, Tract 2541" ae approved February 20, 1964, a copy of which is attached hereto ae Exhibit "A". There being no further business to cone before the Commission, upon motion of Com- miaeioner Wipfli, seconded by Commissioner Lozano, the meeting was adjourned at 9:40 P.M. to meet again on Wednesday, February 26, 1964, at 8:00 P.M.