My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
04/08/64
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1960-1969
>
1964
>
04/08/64
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2013 4:24:34 PM
Creation date
7/9/2007 9:13:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/8/1964
DOCUMENT NAME
04/08/64
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
b. The street frontage of the off-street parking shall <br />be landscaped as a screen with a minimum height of <br />four feet. Said lanc;,caping must be maintained in <br />a neat condition by the applicant. In the event said <br />landscaping is not maintained to the eatiefaction of <br />the City, the City reserves the right to require the <br />installation of a wood fence four feet in height to <br />supplement said landscaping. <br />c. A wood fence with a minimum height of four feet shall <br />be installed around the entire perimeter of the usable <br />portion of the site, with the exception of the parking <br />area. <br />d. Street improvements on Golden Road and Hopyard Road <br />serving the site shall be completed to the eatiefaction <br />of the City Engineer prior to any use of the swim club <br />facility. As an interim measure, a temporary driveway <br />shall be constructed along the general alignment of <br />Harvest Road. <br />Chairman ~.andon then referred back to the Variance application of Richard Garcia, <br />which was continued from earlier on the. agenda. City Attorney Struthers was asked <br />to define dwelling groups in contradistinction Co rear yard dwellings. Mr. <br />Struthers said that Section 17.500 of the Zoning Ordinance does not definitely <br />define how many dwellings constitute a group. However, it ie his opinion that it <br />ie not the intent of the Zoning Ordinance to consider a principal house and a rear <br />house as a dwelling group. Mr. Fales stated that, on the basis of the City At- <br />torney's opinion, a Variance is not required in this instance, and the $10 Variance <br />fee should be refunded. The staff recommended further that the application for a <br />Zoning Permit filed by Mr. Garcia in conjunction with the Variance application be <br />granted with three conditions outlined. After discussion by the Commission, upon <br />motion of Commissioner Rega, seconded by Commissioner Antonini, the following <br />resolution was adopted by unanimous vote of those Commissioners present: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 294 <br />WHEREAS, the application of Richard Garcia, Apt. 71, Kottinger Village, <br />for a Zoning Permit in accordance with Section 17.500, Ordinance <br />No. 309, in order to construct a rear dwelling at 209 Weat Angela Street, <br />in an R-1 District, has come before this Commission; <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: <br />1. The above-named Zoning Permit is hereby granted subject <br />to the following conditions: <br />a. A total of four off-street parking spaces must be <br />provided for the existing dwelling and the proposed <br />dwelling. <br />b. The existing structure at the rear of the property <br />must be demolished. <br />c. Sidewalk must be constructed to City standards along <br />the full street frontage of the property in question. <br />The next item on the agenda to be considered was the application o£ Duke T. Bonds, <br />524 Neal Street, for a Zoning Permit with Site Plan and Architectural Approval in <br />order to allow construction of a duplex on property located at the southeast corner <br />of Pleasanton Avenue and Division Street, in an RG-15 District. tor. Falea said <br />the staff recommends granting the Zoning Permit with the stipulation that five <br />conditions be met as outlined. After discussion by the Coa®iaeion, upon motion of <br />Commi.saioner Lozano, seconded by Commissioner Antonini, the following resolution <br />was adopted by unanimous vote of those Commissioners present: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.