|
no further comments from the audience, it was moved by Commissioner Lozano, seconded
<br />by Co~iseioner Antonini, and carried, that the public hearing be closed, Mr. Pales
<br />in giving the staff report, referred to the report of Livingston and Blayney on the
<br />proposed annexation, dated May 15, 1964, in which they state a mobile home park
<br />would be an appropriate use on tl-e rear portion of the property, and appropriate
<br />zoning would be C-T. The staff recommends that a street in back of the property be
<br />conatructecl, retention and possible extension of the facility now present on the
<br />property, andrecommendation to the City Council to proceed crith annexation with
<br />C-T zoning upon annexation. After discussion by the Commission, upon motion of
<br />Commissioner Rega, seconded by Commissioner Johnston, the following resolution was
<br />adopted by unanimous vote:
<br />RESOLllTION N0, 318
<br />RESOLVHD:
<br />The City Planning Coa~misaion hereby recommends to the
<br />City Council that proposed Annexation No. 34, be
<br />consummated by the City of Pleasanton, and that, upon
<br />annexation, the subject property be zoned C-T (Commercial
<br />Thoroughfare) under the acme terms and conditions re-
<br />garding land use as were applied to the area of Annexation
<br />No. 33.
<br />Chairman Landon opened the public hearing on the application of John M. Stanley,
<br />3850-J Vineyard Avenue, for an amendment to Ord. No. 309 rezoning the property
<br />located at 4263 Pleasanton Avenue from R-1 to RG-25. Mr, Stanley was present is
<br />the audience, There being no comments from the audience, it was moved by
<br />Co:~ieaioner Antonini, seconded by Commissioner Lozano, and carried, that the
<br />public hearing be cloned. Mr. Falea stated that the staff recommends rezoning the
<br />subject parcel to RG-25, as it is contiguous to a larger parcel recently rezoned
<br />from R-1 to RG-25 on reco®endation of the City Planning Consultants, Livingston
<br />and Blayney, dated February 7, 1964, After discussion by the Commission, upon
<br />motion of Commissioner Antonini, seconded by Commissioner Lozano, the following
<br />resolution was adopted by unanimous vote.
<br />RESOLDTION N0. 319
<br />WHEREAS, the application of John M. Stanley, 3850-J Vineyard Avenue, for an
<br />amendment to Ord. No. 309 rezoning the property located at 4263
<br />Pleasanton Avenue from R-1 to RG-25 hoe come before this Co®isaion; and
<br />WHEREAS this Commission does find that;
<br />1. Notice has been given as required by Section 22.104
<br />of Ordinance No. 309;
<br />2. The proposed amendment conforms with the Pleasanton
<br />General Plan; and
<br />3. The public necessity and general welfare require the
<br />proposed change of district;
<br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
<br />RESOLVED, that the City Planning Coa®ieaion does hereby recommend for
<br />approval by the City Co~mcil the application for rezoning of
<br />the subject property as described above.
<br />Chairman Landon ogened the public hearing on the application of C. Beratlis, 550
<br />Main Street., Pleasanton, for an amendment to Ord, No, 309 rezoning a parcel of
<br />property located at 366 Christina Court from the R-1 to the R-2 District, Mr.
<br />Beratlis was present in the audience and stated that, because of the unique
<br />character of the lot, his proposal for the construction of two duplexes is the
<br />only economically workable solution. He stated the subject lot was created by the
<br />Water District in 1916, and now, as an open reservoir, it is a hazard to small
<br />children, in addition to which it produces a mosquito problem. Mr, H, R, Shamblin
<br />spoke against the proposal, reciting that a petition signed by residents of the
<br />subject area has been filed in opposition to the proposal, and emphasized the
<br />parking problem which he felt would be created with greater density. Mr. Ed Alves,
<br />3.
<br />
|