|
une. The type of a~i4rextising aign raqueste3 by thin application does not appear to
<br />be covered by the present Ordinance, and the staff believes a ruling; by the Plan-
<br />nf.ng Gommission would be in order. During the enFUing d!.acusoian by the Commission
<br />it was judged that the eiSn was not necessary to existing uee of property and the
<br />aign would not be on the applicant's property. 'ihe Cc+.~miasion wee not in favor of
<br />locating permanent advertising signs at the southwest c~rrner of F1ret and Neal
<br />Streets and felt it would set an undesirable precedent. ihe applicant may apply
<br />for a Variance if he so desires. After discussion by the Commission, upon motion
<br />of GomG]±.asioner Antonini, seconded by Com;ni.asioner Rega, the following resolution
<br />was adopted by unanimous vote.of those Cozrsniasioners present:
<br />RESOLUTION N0. 335
<br />WHEREAS, the application of Milton S. and Julie D. Dunham, 122 West Neal
<br />Street, for a Zoning Permit in order to erect an advertising sign
<br />on the southwest corner of First and Neal Streets, in a C-C District, has
<br />come before ttiia Commission;
<br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
<br />RESOLVED, that the above-named Zoning Permit ie hereby denied at this time.
<br />The next item on the agenda was the application of D & V Builders, Inc., 6000
<br />Telegraph Avenue, Oakland, for an amendment to Ordinance No. 309 rezoning approxi-
<br />mately 115 acres located north of Black Avenue, south of Valley Avenue, and east
<br />o£ Nopyard Road, from the A District to the R-1 and RG-15 Districts. Mr. Fates
<br />revie*aed previous discussions and read from the Livingston and Blayney report dated
<br />July 17, 1964, the four points listed: (1) That the plan be revised eo that no more
<br />than 25 per cent of the total number of units within the portion of Annexation
<br />No. 31 owned or controlled by the applicant (not to exceed 1,014 units) are apart-
<br />ments, and that no more than one-half of these be at RG-15 density. (2) That the
<br />street pattern be revised to eliminate a four-way intersection of collector streets.
<br />(3) That the park site be revised to reduce street frontage and increase minimum
<br />depth. (4) That the Pleasanton Elementary School District confirm its approval of
<br />the location, size and shape of the school sites. Mr. Fates again outlined the
<br />suggestion fors passive park. Mr. Dudley Frost explained that the reason the swim
<br />club, as presently shown in a rectangular design rather than square, is to provide
<br />bettes utilization of land. It was decided that a 50-50 proportion between RG-15
<br />and P.G-25 zoning would be adequate, also to accept the questionable four-way
<br />intereeCtion. It was felt that the City would gain by having the park, and it was
<br />pointed out that traffic can be controlled thereby making the four-way intersection
<br />acceptable. It was further determined that the park would be maintained by the
<br />City; the swim club be placed in the new location; and that the location of element-
<br />ary and junior high school sites is approved. Chairman Landon then cloned the
<br />public hearing on this matter. After discussion by the Commission, upon motion of
<br />'Commiaeloner Rega, seconded by Commissioner Lozano, the following resolution was
<br />adopted by unanimous vote~of those Comtoisaioners present:
<br />RESOLUTION NO. 336
<br />WHEREAS, the revised application of D & V Builders, Inc., 6000 Telegraph
<br />Avenue, Oakland, for an amendment to Ordinance No. 309 rezoning
<br />approximately 90 acres located north of Black Avenue, south of Valley
<br />Avenue, and east of Nopyard Road, from the A District to the R-1, RG-25
<br />and RG-15 Districts, has come before this Commission;
<br />NO'vJ, THEREFORE, BE IT
<br />RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council thst
<br />an amendment to Ordinance No. 309 rezoning approximately 90 acres
<br />located north of Black Avenue, south of Valley Avenue, and east of Nopyard
<br />Road, from the A District to t'.ie R-', RG-25 and RG-15 Districts be approved
<br />as shown on the approved T^n::ative Map of Tract No. 2680, Pleasanton Valley.
<br />The next item on the agenda was the consideration of Tentative Subdivision Map,
<br />Tract No. 2680, Pleasanton Valley. In giving the staff report, Mr. Campbell stated
<br />the following conditions:
<br />1. Street Geometrica - (a) All streets intersecting Valley Avenue should have
<br />corner property line radii of 40 feet, (b) There shall be acceleration and
<br />deceleration lanes.
<br />
|