11/25/64 - Laserfiche WebLink

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the above-named Conditional Use Permit is hereby granted subject to the following conditions: 1. If variances from the provisions of Ordinance No. 309 are required for the development in question, these must be secured by application to the Planning Comnisaion prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. All off-street parking and the access thereto moat be reviewed by the City Engineer after submittal of a property survey, with particular attention paid to the provision of a "turn-around" so that vehicles are not required to back the full length of the lot and onto Bernal Avenue. 3. Curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway, tie-in paving and street trees must be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4. The architecture of the proposed addition must conform with that of the existing unite. 5. The applicant moat comply with all other applicable ordinances, rules and regulations of the City, particularly the Survey Ordinance. The next item on the agenda was a consideration of land use; proposed Annexation No. 36 (Arnaudon property). Mr. Falea expleiaed that this matter has been continued several times. Originally, an annexation study on the subject property was made by Livingston and Blayney and submitted in a report dated September 18, 1964. Sub- aequently, the applicant asked for consideration of the appropriateness of I-P zoning. Under date of October 26, 1964, Livingston 6 Blayney submitted an addition- al report and concluded that they believe Industrial Park zoning would be approp- riate provided that a landscaped buffer of at least 50 feet be established between the Industrial Park District and any residential use. The staff concurs with the recommendation of Livingston & Blayney. Mr. Marsh was present in the audience, and also Mr. Lee Amaral, who spoke on behalf of the applicant, and said the applicant concurs with everything the staff hoe stated, and submitted a rough sketch showing access to the subject property. After discussion by the Co®iaeion, upon motion of Commissioner Antonini, seconded by Commissioner Rega, the following resolution was adopted by unanimous vote: RESOLUTION N0. 364 RESOLVED: The City Planning Commission does hereby make the following recommendation to the City Council: 1. Proposed Annexation No. 36, Pleasanton-Suno1 Annex "E", ie appropriate and should be consummated. 2. Upon annexation, the property in question should be zoned I-P, Industrial Park. 3. The annexation agreement for this area should stipulate the establishment of a landscaped buffer 50 feet in width adjacent to any residential areas, and should provide for the establishment of vehicular parking and etzeet access which will not interfere with adjacent residential uses. Chairmen Landon proceeded to a further discussion re; Allocation of Zoning District Raiser Aluminum and Chemical Corp. Site, Sunol Blvd. (Annexation No. 35). Mr. Fales referred Co a letter from Bruce Oliver, Attorney for the above-mentioned corporation dated November 17, 1964, in which changes in Ord. No. 309 with regard to I-P zoning are propoa®d. Mr. Falea read the following sections of Ord. No. 309, following each with the proposed modifications ae submitted by Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corp.; Sections 14.100, 14.200(c), 14.300, 14.501, 14.502, 14.700, and 14.804. Mr. Falea stated further that there seems to be no reason why the changes proposed by Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corp. would not be compatible, and suggested the Commission take them under advisement for consideration of mocification of Ord. No. 309 in