|
:tESOLUTI0A7 N0. 403
<br />WHEREAS, the application of Mr. Herbert B. Hauso, 680 Main St., for a
<br />Zoning Permif.-~i.th Site Plan, Architectural and Landscape
<br />L.pproval in order to add zeataurant facilities to an existing baUcery
<br />nft the above address t?•~ae come before this Commission;
<br />NOW, THEREFO£.R, BE iT
<br />RESOLVED, that the above-named Zoning Permit is hereby approved subject
<br />to the following condition:
<br />1. Applicant shall conform to all other applicable rules,
<br />regulations and ordinances of the City or any other
<br />agency having jurisdiction, particularly the Alameda
<br />County Health Department.
<br />The next item on the agenda was a diacuaeioa of future assignment of a new name
<br />for "Pine Avenue Extension", requested by the City of Livermore. Mr. Falea ex-
<br />plained that the Flanning Director of the City of Livermore requested suggestions
<br />from the Pleasanton Planning Commission. Names considered were "Inman", "Fairlande'~
<br />and "Lae Poaitas". Following discussion, it was the consensus of the Commission
<br />that Che name "Lae Poeitae Boulevard" would be appropriate. The street crosses a
<br />portion of what was the original Rancho Las Poaitas land grant, and will pass
<br />adjacent to the new Lae Poeitae High School in Livermore. There 1s a minor County
<br />road near Livermore now bearing this name, which would have to be changed, Mr.
<br />Fales explained. Upon motion of Chairman Landon, seconded by Commissioner Lozano,
<br />the following resolution was unanimously adopted:
<br />RESOLlTTION N0. 404
<br />RESOLVED:
<br />The City Planning Commission does hereby recommend that
<br />the proposed boulevard shown on the General Plan of the
<br />City of Pleasanton adopted March 1, 1965, as "Pine Avenue
<br />Extension" be renamed, using a designation with historical
<br />significance.
<br />The Planning Commission ie of the opinion Chat "Lae Poaitas
<br />Boulevard" would be a suitable and proper name for the
<br />subject street.
<br />The next item on the agenda was a review of Tentative Subdivision Map, Tract No.
<br />2724 (Schulte-Blackwell). Mr. Ted Fairfield, of MacKay and Sompe, stated that the
<br />Alameda County Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors have adopted the
<br />zoning for the subject tract, to become effective approximately April 8, 1965.
<br />Mr. Fairfield pointed out the changes which have been made, including eliminating
<br />five lots and one cul-de-sac. The subject Tentative Map incorporates City of
<br />Pleasanton street standards, including streamlined electric. Mr. Fairfield re-
<br />quested that the Pleasanton Planning Commission approve the Tentative Map subject
<br />ro annexation in order to avoid delays in the event of annexation to the City of
<br />Pleasanton. He staked that the Tentative Map will come before the Alameda County
<br />Planning Commission for approval on April 5. Following discussion, Chairman Landon
<br />requested that the staff studi the subject Tentative Subdivision Map of Traci No.
<br />2724 and repos:L back ~o ~h: Commission on March i~
<br />Chairman Landax: proceeded to a discucsi:+a of possible multiple dwelling unit zoning,
<br />Adams Conrt (req!!est of Air. & Macs. G. ;3anry, 4r,4 Adams ::ourt). Mr. Falea said the
<br />above re~lueat was contained in a l.et~ter. rocetvs~d £rom :1r- and Mrs. Henry, dated
<br />March 8, 1965. Mr, and Mrs, henry n*TMre present: in a:he audience, represented by
<br />Mr. Ferxeire whc~ oddr4ssed thn Commission, tkr--. pointed out ghat in the newly adopt-
<br />ed General Play, t?ie subje~c F=r~perty lies in a medium density area. He presented
<br />a design whir_tt. proposes a two-et~ry apart,msnr: complex containing 18 unite, with
<br />approximately 1,800 sq.i`t. is each unit, on approximately 40,000 eq.ft. of property,
<br />with parking accommodations for 30 cars. This would be a moderake rental unit of
<br />Bavarian-rype architecture. with +~:he buildings situat:Pd on r_hc c~ontoura of the hill
<br />and preserving ::he view, kir b`e::reira riuggc .i~.ed :, Field trig ko the Commi.saion
<br />to inspect t1:~ subject site, T6r. isles pointed out that the present zoning is R-1.
<br />The formal procedure in this matter is to vwke application for rezoning of the
<br />subject property to the Plauning Commisaioci to RG-15 or RG-25, or if the plan is
<br />reduced to a 5-pier, for instance, it might be handled under a Variance. Chairman
<br />Landon stated that if formal application is made it will be given consideration.
<br />
|