|
tion by the Commission, it was moved by Chairmen Landon, seconded by Commissioner
<br />Johnston, and carried, that, with the consent of the applicant, the public hear-
<br />ings on the Conditional Use Permit and Variance on the above-described property
<br />be continued to the meeting of June 23, 1965.
<br />Chairman Landon opened the public hearing on the application of John M. Stanley,
<br />4263 Pleasanton Ave., far a Variance from Section 8.500, Ord. No. 309, in order
<br />to construct a carport with a reduced side-yard setback, in connection with an
<br />existing duplex, in an RG-25 District. Mr. Campbell, in presenting the staff
<br />report, stated that on April 14, 1965, the Planning Commission approved a Zoning
<br />Permit application to allow the applicant to construct a duplex on the subject
<br />property with a condition that the garage moat be moved. The garage has aub-
<br />aequently been demolished, and the applicant now wishes to replace it with a car-
<br />port. The staff recommends approval of the subject Variance with the condition
<br />that the Variance remain in effect only as long ae the existing house at 4263
<br />Pleasanton Avenue remains standing. Mr. John Stanley was present in the audience
<br />and spoke on behalf of the subject application. There being no further comments
<br />from the audience, it was moved by Commissioner Lozano, seconded by Commissioner
<br />Antonini, and carried, that the public hearing be closed. After discussion by
<br />the Commission, upon motion of Commissioner Lozano, seconded by Commissioner
<br />Antonini, the following resolution was adopted by unanimous vote:
<br />RESOLUTION N0. 432
<br />WI7EREAS, the application of John M. Stanley, 4263 Pleasanton Ave., for
<br />a Variance from Section 8.500, Ord. No. 309, in order to
<br />construct a carport with a reduced aide-yard setback, 1n connection
<br />with an existing duplex, in an RG-25 District, has come before this
<br />Goiania s1on;
<br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
<br />RESOLVED, that the above-named Variance ie hereby granted subject to
<br />the following condition:
<br />1. The subject Variance shall remain in effect only as
<br />long as the existing house at 4263 Pleasanton Avenue
<br />remains standing.
<br />Chairman Landon proceeded to the application of John M. Stanley, 3850 Vineyard
<br />Avenue, for a Zoning Permit with Site Plan and Architectural Approval in order to
<br />construct a carport in connection with an existing duplex located at 4263
<br />Pleasanton Avenue, in an RG-25 District. Following consideration by the Commie-
<br />ai.on, upon motion of Commissioner Lozano, seconded by Commissioner Antonini, the
<br />following resolution was adopted by unanimous vote:
<br />RESOLUTION N0. 433
<br />WHEREAS, the application of John M. Stanley, 3850 Vineyard Ave., for a
<br />Zoning Permit with Site Plan and Architectural Approval in
<br />order to construct a carport in connection with an existing duplex
<br />Located at 42n3 Pleasanton Ave., in an AG-25 District, has come before
<br />this Commission;
<br />NOW, THERFFOR.Ti, BE IT
<br />P.ESOLV%D, that the above-named 7.oning Permit is hereby approved.
<br />The n~xf. item on tie egeacie was the erp7.ication of Federal Sign and signal Corp.,
<br />950 30'ch St., Oaklerd, fora 7,aning Permit in order to install a sign at 273
<br />Spring St., in connect'..on with a veterinary hospital, in a C-C District. Mr.
<br />Campbell, in presenting the staff report, stated the sign requirements as contain-
<br />ed in Sections 11.201 and 17.705 of Ord. No. 309, indicating that algae necessary
<br />fox a permitted use are allowed ae ar, accessory use, and direct and constant
<br />illumination is per:,+itted. Also, announcement or professional signs shall not
<br />be over 2 aq.ft. in a*ea. The propor~d sign has an area of 24 eq.ft., is 10 ft.
<br />clear from the ground on an 18' 6" pose, Z+: appears to the staff that the sub-
<br />ject sign is a professional sign and, therefore, does not conform to Section
<br />17.705 of Ord. No. 309. Further, the ate:f suggests that the sign ie not compat-
<br />ible with the present neighborhood, the raw development on the site, or the
<br />
|