PC 05/17/67 - Laserfiche WebLink

(1) Approval of V-67-19 (2) Two additional parking spaces shall be provided in the rear yard area with access from Pico Drive: (3) Private open space may be provided for the front unit as an option. Approval of size, fence design and landscaping to rest with Planning Director. (4) All plant material shown shall be at least 5 gallon stock when installed. (5) Areas not shown for shrub planting shall be turfed. 4d. UP-67-9. Lvnnewood Methodist Church. Chairman Antonini opened the public hearing on the application of Lynnewood Methodist Church, 1560 Santa Rita Road, Pleasanton, for a Use Permit under Section 4.309 to allow a church meeting place in portions of an existing residence located on the west side of Foothill Road approximately 1/4 mile north of Bernal Avenue in an A District. Mr. Spink presented the staff report which recommended approval with stated conditions. Mr. J. Jack Brae, representing the Church, was present and stated that the Church objected to site plan, landscape and archi- tectural controls. Mr. Bras further stated that the Church at this time could not financially afford to construct the driveway or additional parking. Mr. Bras stated he felt the driveway and parking was adequate as it now exists. Mr. Edwin Carter was present and objected to the Church being in this location and indicated that deed restrictions would not allow a Church in this Rrl area. Mr. Struthers informed the Co®iseion to consider only land use under the City Zoning Ordinance. Mr. [d. J. Waggoner stated the area was a beautiful residential area and that he wanted it to stay that way. Mr. Stevenson stated his objections and felt the Commission could act to save the residents a court battle. Mr. Philip Wehr representing the Church stated that this development was intended to be a devel- opment of culture and activities for people in the surrounding area. Darrell Darling, Pastor of the Methodist Church, pointed out that most churches are located in R-1 areas in various communities. Upon motion of Chairman Antonini, seconded by Commissioner Carrigan, and carried, the public hearing was closed. After further discussion, UPON MOTION OF COMMISSIONER PLATO, SECONDED BY COMMISS- IONER ARNOLD, AND CARRIED, IT WAS DETERMINED TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM TO THE bfERTIN(+ OF JONE 28, 1967, REOPENING THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE CDAIDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND CONTINUING THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE VARIANCE APPLICATION. This was done with the consent of the applicant. 4f. V-67-20. Raymond Esola. Chairman Antonini opened the public hearing on the application of Raymond Esola, 684 Bonita Avenue, for a Variance from Section 8.500, Ordinance No. 309, to allow a reduction in required rear yard of 10 feet in order to construct a four- plex at 835 Palomino Drive in an RG-25 District. Mr. Spink presented the staff report which recosmmended approval. Mr. Esola was present in the audience and concurred with the staff report. Upon motion of Commissioner Carrigan, seconded by Comriinsioner Johnston, and"carried, theCpublic hearing was closed. Upon motion of Commissioner Johnston, seconded by Cha~xman Antonini, the following resolution was adopted unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 677 WHEREAS, the application of Raymond Esola, 684 Bonita Avenue, for a Variance from Section 8.500, Ordinance No. 309 to allow a reduction in required rear yard of 10 feet in order to construct a four-plex at 835 Palomino Drive in an RG-25 District, has come before this Commission: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: that the above-named application be approved subject to Exhibit "A" including a reduced front yard of 20 feet 0 inches. 4g. Z-67-26. Raymond Esola. The next item on the agenda was the application of Raymond Esola, 684 Bonita Avenue, for a Zoning Permit with site plan, landscape and architectural approval in order to construct a four-plex at 835 Palomino Drive in an RG-25 District. Mr. Spink presented the staff report which recommended approval with stated conditions. After further discussion, UPON MOTION ~ COMMISSIONER GARRIGAN, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER JOHNSTON, AND CARRIED, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE ABOVE APPLICATION BE APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) Approval of V-67-20. (2) Enter into a joint access agreement with the adjoining property owner with the City to receive an emergency access easement. Foxm subject to approval of the City Attorney. (3) Washed rock area nearest street to be planted in grass. 5-17-67