PC 06/14/67 - Laserfiche WebLink

the staff report which recanmended approval subject to stated conditions. Mr. J. Jack Brae, representing the First National Bank, was present in the audience. After further discussion, UPON MOTION OF CHAIRMAN ANTONINI, SECONDED BY COM- MISSIONER ARNOLD, AND CARRIEDy IT WAS DETERt~IINED THAT THE ABOVE NAMED APPLI- CATION BE APPROVED SUBJECT TO TEIH FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Existing curb, gutter and sidewalk to be replaced. Final design details to be approved by the City Engineer in conjunction with approval of improvement plans. 2. Plans be revised to provide a public rear entrance. 3. An encroachment permit shall be obtained for building projections into the public right-of-way. 4. A magazine for a minimum of four vehicles shall be provided for the drive- up window. 5. Sfgn location and design shall be obtained by separate approval. 6. All plant material shall be at least 5 gallon stock except Ivy which may be in flats. 7. Street trees and on-site trees shall be the same variety. The selection proposed shall be one that will create a canopy effect over the sidewalk area, subject to approval of Director of Planning. B. Curb divider for drive-up window lane be provided. Se. Z-66-41. Frank AufderMaur. The next item on the agenda was the application of Frank AufderMaur, P. O. Box 548, Pleasanton for final Planning Commission approval of Site Plan, Landscape and Architectural proposals for a Planned Unit Development per conditions of PlanntnR Commission approval of November 9, 1966, for property located at 2955 Vineyard Avenue in an RG-25 zone. Mr. Spink presented the staff report which recon~n,c+~ded approval with stated conditions. Mr. AufderMaur, Mr. R{,ekenbach, and their architect, Frank Gonsalves, were present in the audience. After further dis- cussion, UPON MOTION OF CHAIRMAN ANTONINI, SECONDED BY CCtII9LSSI(~R GARRI!.AN, AND CARRIED, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THF. AAOVE NAMh7) AYPI.iCATION BE APPROVED SUBJECT TO TBE FOLLOWING CONDITION3: 1. Buildings 14 and 17 to be set back 5 feet from the property line or the applicant to provide the City with evidence of light and air easements for the length of the buildings and ten feet in width from the adjoining property owners. Form to be satisfactory to the City Attorney. 2. Location and design of fencing, retaining walls and landscaping for Carport ~k13 to be by negotiation between the applicant, the owners of adjoining properties and the Director of Planning. 3. Location of Carports ~8 and F9 subject to approval of the City Engineer and Director of Planning, particularly of any retaining walls or fill into the Arroyo Del Valle. 4. Exterior elevation of buildings 1 and 3 to be modified to incorporate more extensive use of wood siding in lieu of stucco. Hlevations to be approved by the Director of Planning in conjunction with issuance of build- ing permits for Phase I. 5. Exterior elevation of buildings 5, 7 and 9 be modified to incorporate more extensive use of wood siding in lieu of stucco. Elevation to be approved by the Director of Planning in conjunction with issuance of building permits for Phase II. 6. A community-type 6-foot redwood fence shall be provided on all property lines except the line adjacent to the Arroyo del Valle and except across and back 20 feet from the Vineyard Avenue frontage. (a) A two-foot ornamental wall on the driveway entrance to be provided, design subject to staff approval. 7. Parking spaces shall be provided on a 1~ to 1 basis for each phase of devel- opment. 8. All driveways and parking areas shall be paved to City standards with not less than 5 inches base and 2 inches plant mix. 6-14-67