PC 11/21/67 - Laserfiche WebLink

Application of Land Development and Investment Company, 405 Montgomery Street, San Francisco, request for Tentative Map approval for an area of approximately 226 acres, located generally on the south side of Vineyard Avenue. Mr. Fairfield introduced John Stone from Land Development Co. to the Commission, both concurred with the staff report. Upon motion of Commissioner Plato, seconded by Chairman Antonini, the following resolution was adopted by unanimous vote: RESOLUTION N0. 734 WHEREAS, the application of Land Development and Investment Company for Tentative Map Approval for an area of approximately 22G acres, Tract 2980, has come before this Commission, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: that the above application be approved with the following conditions: 1. Street Classifications - The classifications as indicated by the street width on Exhibit A are recommended with the following changes: a. Oro Fino Court, Marsala Court and Malvasia Court should be increased to 46 foot right-of-way width if on the Final Map their length exceeds 300 feet. b. Brandy Court and Chianti Court shall be increased in width to 42 feet and 46 feet respectively. c. Hillside standard street section is shown for Char- donnay Road and Semillion Road. This is satisfactory to the Public :dorks Department and allowable under Section 7.15 of Ordinance No. 358 and is brought to your attention as a point of information. 2. Street Names - Tawny Drive should be used on only one seg- ment of the two shocm. Arbor, Burgandy, Delaware and Madeira are duplications or near duplications of street names in Livermore. With talk of a super combined City of Pleasanton, Livermore and Dublin, the Planning Com- mission might desire that further duplication of street names in these areas be eliminated, although in the past we have allowed conflicts with names used in Livermore. 3. Street Geometries - a. Prior to the filing of the final map for this area, street names shall be submitted to the County to allow checking for possible conflicts with the Master Street Name Index. b. There are several instances of opposing streets entering upon a cross street without the minimum off-set between centerlines as required by Article 7.06(1) of the Subdivision Ordinance. One such situation that is likely to cause problems is the intersection of two segments of Tawny Drive with Touriga Drive. Staff recommends that these intersections either be aligned or separated a minimum of 300 feet between Center lines. A modification of Ordinance requirements is recommended for all other such situations. c. It is recommended that the intersection of Vineyard Ave. and Touriga Drive be channelized and the right-of- way flared for additional stacking lanes as required by the City Engineer. 4. Grading Plans - It is recoarsended that the Planning Com- mission require grading plans to be submitted for approval on any areas where the average slope exceeds 5% prior to approval of the Final Map covering those areas. 5. Storm Drainase System - Detailed checking of the storm drainage system has not yet been completed and approval of this portion of Che map should be withheld pending completion of the necessary calculations. 6. Water Supply & Distribution System - The water supply and distribution system should reflect the long-range needs of the City and the Water District in this area.. Approval of this portion of the map should be withheld pending determination of the long-range needs in this area. 7. Sanitary Sewer System - A detailed revie~•~ of the proposed sanitary sewer system has not been made at this time