PC 01/17/68 - Laserfiche WebLink

lines shall be submitted to the Planning Couonission for approval prior to the acquisition of right-of-way thereof. Upon review of the utility company's application and the Planning Director's proposed conditions for route approval, the Planning Commission may set a public hearing for purposes of considering alternate routes, or modifying any conditions vital to the public interest, ~~~hich in the opinion of the Planning Cammission requires a public hearing. At this point Chairman Antonini called for a recess at 9:15 P. M. Chairman Antonini reconvened the meeting at 9:25 P.M. ARTICLE 9. Section 9.100, page 81. - Add subsection a to read: "To protect the natural resources in the City and assure that their utiliza- tion is not prejudiced by the intrusion of incompatible uses." Section 9.103x, page 82. Changed to read: Cement and concrete products manufacture, including concrete mixing and batching. Section 9.104.1c, paP.e 83. Changed to read: General Location and configuration of storage areas for topsoil, other overburden, silt, extracted material, and waste. Section 9.104.3, pa.xe 84. Change Section 24.116 to Section 24.111, throughout paragraph. There was considerable discussion concerning the five year review of Conditional Use Permits, as suggested in Section 9.104.3. It was stated that if the conditions of the permit ~,~ere not met 'oy the company, the permit could be revoked at any time. The Commission agreed to the proposed change by the Quarry Commitee: Every five years the permittee shall submit to the City a written report indicating current operating activities and phases. The report would be reviewed by the City and condition changes could be made by mutual agreement. Every 25 years, the report would be considered and changes and conditions could be made. Section 9.104.4, pale 84. Concerning pre-existing uses, it was decided to ask for an interpretation by Mr. Struthers, and revised wording would be presented at the January 31st meeting. Section 9.104.5, pare 85. Considerable discussion evolved concerning the possible necessity for a wider buffer zone than the proposed 50 feet. Discussion from audience from BYr. Bill Downing, from Kaiser Sand 6 Gravel, in favor of proposed 50 foot buffer zone. Mr. Ted Lannin supported the suggested 150 feet buffer zone. Mr. Walt Johnson and Mr. Victor Bailey also spoke in reference to the 50 foot buffer zone. The section remained unchanged. Section 9.104.Sd. Changed to read; d. The excavation of a pit or quarry shall be conducted in such a menner as to prevent accumulation of polluted water or natural seepage to the maximum ex- tent possible but not precluding the use of pits for recharge purposes. All other articles remained unchanged. ARTICLE 17. Section 17.108, pare 131. Entire section changed to read as follows: The Zoning Administrator may authorize two (2) advertising signs and two (2) directional signs and may authorize up to two (2) additional directional signs when he finds such to be necessary after a final subdivlslon map has been recorded, subject to all of the following provisions: a. The signs may be either single or double-faced, or v-shaped provided the angle between the two faces does not exceed sixty (60) degrees; _3_ 1-17-68