PC 01/17/68 - Laserfiche WebLink

safety reasons. Mr. Struthers stated our liability insurance and the home- owners policy would cover any accidents on this portion of property. UPON MOTION OF COMMISSIONER ARNOLD, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER PLATO, AND CARRIED, IT WAS DETERMINED TO APPROVE THE ABOVE APPLICATION WITA THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1, That the Use Permit is granted for the property as described in the appli- cation and any attachments thereto, and as shown on Che plot plan and elevation plans submitted, labeled Exhibit A. 2. That the applicant shall provide 14 parking stalls which shall be striped and bumper stopped. 3. ThaC landscaping, shall be provided as per list of materials as described on the plot plan labeled Exhibit A. 4. That all landscaped areas within the parking lot shall be protected by 4" redwood header. 5. That the 16 foot wide easement, extending across Dr. Shanks' property, shall be paved with asphaltic concrete. G. That all curb openings shall be subject to the approval of the Public Works Director. 7. ThaC all exterior materials for the main structure shall be as per descriptions noted on the construction plaAS, except roof material. 8. That a survey of the subject property be re-submitted. 9. New sidewalk, curb, and gutter shall be required for the entire length, subject to the approval of the Public Worlcs Director, and improve- ment plans shall be submitted. 10. That applicant shall dedicate to the City the necessary right-of-way on Main Street, to be established by the Public Works Department. 11. The gas light has been reviewed and shall remain. 12. The roof material shall be John Mansvilie, as presented at the meeting. 13. That the standard sidewalk shall be used. Sd. Next to be considered was the request of Mr. Hottei, 7854 Applewood Way, for a definition of parking requirements for residential housing. Mr. Castro explained Chat Mr. Hottel is proposing conversion of the garage to a room, and asked if parking in the driveway could be considered to meet the require- ments of two off-street parking spaces, (Section 6.602). Mr. Castro stated his interpretation of the Ordinance dfd not consider uncovered off-street parking to meet the requirements. Mr. Hottel noted that he had discussed the interpretation of covered off-street parking areas with the City of Livermore and the County. It was noted that the proposed Zoning Ordinance requires a covered carport or garage. Chairman Antonini suggested to Mr. Hottel that he apply for a Zoning Permit and submit plans showing proposed parking spaces, and a determination of parking requirements would be considered at the time the opplication was submitted to Che Planning Commission. It vas decided to ask for an interpretation of the Ordinance from Mr. Struthers. Sc. RZ-67-11, Planning Commission. Chairman Antonini reopened the public hearing on the application of the Plan- ning Commission to consider the adoption of a new Zoning Ordinance, con- tinued from 9/27, LO/10, 11/1, 11/15, and 12/6/67. Section 1.104, page 3. Changed to read as follows: 'Phis Ordinance shall apply to all property, except public streets and alleys, owned by private persons, firms, corporations, or organizations; by the United States of America or any of its agencies; by the State of California or any of its agencies or political subdivisions; by any City or County, including the City of Pleasanton or any of its agencies; or by any authority or district organized under the laws of the State of California. This Ordinance shall apply to structures and signs extending into or above streets or alleys, to railroad rights of way, to electric and communications distribution and service wires where prescribed in the district regulations; provided, however, that the routes of proposed electric or gas transmission _2_ 1-17-68