PC 03/13/68 - Laserfiche WebLink

6. That approval of the water supply and distribution system be withheld until the developer has demonstrated to the satis- faction of the City Engineer that the proposed system meets both the immediate and long range requirements for supplying water in this area. J. That approval of the storm drainage system be withheld until final design calculations have been checked and the developer has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the City Engineer that the system fully meets the requirements of this development and all upstream areas intended to be drained through this tract and that the requirements of Alameda County Fiood Control District have been met. 8. That the Planning Commission allow a modification of Article 7.04, Ordinance No. 358, approving the five cul-de-sacs over 500 feet in length. 9. That Hopyard Road be increased to a half-width of 64 feet across the entire tract frontage. 10. That the developer agree to participate in financing the replacement of the drainage structure at the Hopyard Road crossing of the Pleasanton Cauel to the extent determined by the City Engineer, further that the developer is obligated to pay one-half the cost of "Y" Drive crossing of Pleasanton Canal (structure and roadway). 11. That in the areas where sidewalk is to be eliminated,a,etrip 8 feet in width be kept free and clear of trees to provide space for sidewalks should they be desired in the future. 12. That reimbursement to Pleasanton Township County Water District be made by developer for water facilities installed by the District. Said payment would be in the amount of $17,500 and would be due and payable at the time of approval of the first final map, or in accordance with approved exist- ing annexation agreement governing the property. 13. That all existing wells on the property be properly sealed and abandoned in accordance with City standards. 14. That the right-of-way width of A Street be reduced to 55 feet only in that section between HH Court and BB Court. 15. That a grading plan be submitted with the improvements showing some means of positive drainage through the park before the lower cul-de-sac lots would be inundated. 16. That the Planning Director be authorized to make the determination concerning setbacks on individual lots at the time of the building permit application. 17. That the elimination of public sidewalks on one side of the street shall be permitted only for Unit ill. Further, that upon the completion of Unit i61 the Commission shall recon- sider whether or not the remaining sidewalk area should be installed for Unit ~kl or be continued to be eliminated as shown on the preliminary map, labeled Exhibit "A". (Pedestrian circulation and area study map). 17a. Should the Planning Commission decide that sidewalks are required for Unit #1, the developer shall be responsible for said improvements. 18. That the applicant submit a formal rezoning application to rezone the property from agricultural to those uses speci- fied on the tentative map. 19. That the Zoning Permit (Z-68-11) which covers the ap- proval of the planned unit development shall be subject to approval at such time as final plans have been submitted for the location of all fences, signs, roadways, landscaping, entrance street details and other facilities or features, which shall be located substantially as shown on the tentative map or preliminary plans labeled Exhibit A. 3-13- 68