Laserfiche WebLink
if Western Sierra Lumber Company had not supported the annexation, it <br />undoubtedly would have failed. Mr. Falea read a portion of a memorandum from <br />him, endorsed by the City Council, which suggested that the City zone Western <br />Sierra Lumber Company's property as Agricultural and allow it as a nonconform- <br />ing use for the full term allowed by the Ordinance. Mr. Fales noted that <br />Western Sierra Company was aware that any proposed remodeling or new con- <br />struction would require a new permit and a hearing before the Planning <br />Commission. After considerable discussion, the Commission noted that due <br />to confusion regarding the intent of the conditional use permit, the public <br />hearing should be rescheduled. UPON MOTION OF CHAIRMAN ANTONINI, SECONDED <br />BY COMMISSIONER PLATO, AND CARRIED, IT WAS DETERMINED TO REOPEN THE PUBLIC <br />HEARING ON UP-67-24 AT THE MEETING OF APRIL 10, 1968, FOLLOWING PUBLICATION. <br />8b. SUBDIVISION MAPS <br />Tract 3004. D & V Builders. <br />Request of D & V Builders for tentative map approval with planned unit <br />development approval. The Commission suggested that a similar light fixture <br />design be used for lighting both the streets and park area.. There was <br />considerable discussion about the elimination of sidewalks from one side <br />of the cul-de-sacs and from one side on some of the streets. The triangular <br />shaped lots were discussed, Mr. Castro favored elimination of these lots. <br />There was some confusion about a possible time limit on the planned unit <br />development, Mr. Frost requested a four year time limit. After further <br />discussion, Mr. Struthers explained that the time limit could be attached <br />to the Zoning Permit. Mr. Castro stated that the Zoning Permit would be <br />considered when the final improvement plans on Tract 3004 had been submitted. <br />Mr. Frost was reminded he should file a Rezoning application. Commissioner <br />Plato expressed his thought that the rezoning application should be considered <br />along with the tentative map. Upon motion of Commissioner Arnold, seconded <br />by Chairman Antonini, the following Resolution was adopted with the following <br />vote: <br />AYES: Chairman Antonini NOES: Commissioner Carrigan <br />Commissioner Arnold <br />Commissioner Plato ABSENT: Commissioner Gibbs <br />RESOLUTION N0. 763 <br />WHEREAS, the request of D 6 V Builders for tentative map <br />approval with planned unit development for <br />Tract 3004 has come before the Commission, <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT <br />RESOLVED: that the above application be approved with <br />the following conditions: <br />1. That all in-tract easements be granted as public service <br />easements with no reference to specific use. <br />2. That the number, size and location of fire hydrants <br />remain subject to change pending completion of a study <br />of this matter by the Fire Chief. <br />3. That the developer provide all the street lighting <br />facilities necessary to adequately light the streets <br />within and adjacent to this tract and the linear park <br />at the lowest possible cost to the City and is accordance <br />with the method, City owned or P.G.d~E. owned, that is <br />commonly in use by the City of Pleasanton at the time <br />of approval of the Final Map. <br />4. That electric power distribution and communication <br />service systems be placed totally underground except for <br />pad-mounted transformers and above-ground splicing cabi- <br />nets where necessary. <br />5. That approval of the sanitary sewer system be withheld <br />until the developer has demonstrated to the satisfaction <br />of the City Engineer that the proposed system is adequate <br />for the service area and generally meets the immediate <br />and long range requirements of the sanitary sewer system <br />in this and all tributary areas. <br />-3' 3-13-68 <br />