|
RESOLUTION N0. 778
<br />WHEREAS, the applications of Morrison Homes, Tamalpais Improve-
<br />ment Co., and Diablo Improvement Co., 6000 Telegraph
<br />Avenue, Oakland for Variances V-68-10, V-68-9, V-68-7,
<br />and V-68-8 to allow the construction of a 6 foot screen
<br />property fence to encroach 5 feet into the required
<br />front yard setback on lots 9, 10, 22, 23, 33, 34, 41
<br />and 42 of Tract 2904 has come before this Commission,
<br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
<br />RESOLVED: that the above applications be approved subject to
<br />the following condition:
<br />1. That the permits are granted for the land as
<br />described in the application and any attachment
<br />thereto and as shown on the plot plans submitted,
<br />labeled Exhibit A.
<br />Se.) V-68-11, Jack Bras for Dou las Huntze
<br />At the request of Mr. Bras, this application was considered later on the agenda.
<br />so the applicant could be present.
<br />Sf.) V-68-13, William E. Thorson,
<br />Chairman Antonini opened the public hearing on the application of William E.
<br />Thorson, 1710 Orchard Way, Fleasanton, for a Variance to allow the construction
<br />of a covered patio to encroach 3 feet into the required rear yard setback.
<br />Upon motion of Chairman Antonini, seconded by Commissioner Carrigan, and
<br />carried, the public hearing was closed. Upon motion of Commisn3 ~r.ex (_n rrip~n,
<br />seconded by Commissioner Gibbs, the following Reaolt~tion was adopted by
<br />unanimous vote:
<br />RESOLUTION N0. 779
<br />WHEREAS, the application of William E. Thorson, 1710
<br />Orchard Way, Pleasanton, for a Variance V-68-13
<br />to allow the construction of a covered patio to
<br />encroach 3 feet into the required rear yard set-
<br />back has come before this Commission,
<br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
<br />RESOLVED: that the above application be approved subject
<br />to the following condition:
<br />1. That the permit is granted for the land as
<br />described in the appllcation and any attachment
<br />thereto, and as shown on the plot plan submitted
<br />labeled Exhibit A.
<br />Sg.) RZ-67-14, Planning Commission.
<br />This matter was continued to the meeting of May 22, 1968, pending a final
<br />decision on Annexation No. 56.
<br />6a.) 2-68-25, Charles E. Walls.
<br />Next was the application of Charles E. Walls, 1216 Encino Street, Hayward,
<br />for a Zoning Permit Z-68-25 for retail selling of ceramic tile, electric
<br />lamps, patio furniture, and marble table tops to be located at 608 Main
<br />Street. Mr. Castro noted the proposed conditions were basically the same
<br />as those placed on the previous owner, plus a condition for providing additional
<br />parking as suggested by the City Council on appeal by a previous applicant.
<br />UPON MOTION OF COMMISSIONER GIBBS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER GARP.IGAId, AND CARRIEi.',
<br />IT WAS DETERMINED TO APPROVE ZONING PERMIT Z-68-25 SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING
<br />CONDT_TIONS:
<br />1. Record owner of the property to enter into an agreement with the City of
<br />Pleasanton to provide additional parking to serve the owner's land by exer-
<br />cising discretion as follows:
<br />a. Cooperate with the City and civic organizations in establishing parking
<br />lots to serve the central businese district.
<br />b. Withhold any protest to assessment districts initiated by the City to
<br />finance parking facilities for the central business district.
<br />4, 5-8-68
<br />
|