PC 09/25/68 - Laserfiche WebLink

50,000 ft. of space in the development. The corner area to the east is presently assigned to a Goodrich dealership. To the west will be a major retail area of 80,000 aq.ft. Parking will be towards Frontage Road. Further down the Frontage Road will be a restaurant, motel and theatre complex. It is the intention of the developer to begin on Phase One as soon as approval has been received from the City. This project will encompass approximately six acres. Commissioner Garrigan remarked that between Phase A and Phase B there is a sub- stantial section of empty space. Mr. Dyer explained that this property was owned by another party and that Mr. Taylor has not been successful in purchasing that portion and has no control over the situation. Development of Phase C will have to remain pending improvement of Frontage Road. Chairman Antonini stressed that the property has applied to come under the Planned Unit District, and as such, is subject to the rules of that District and be under the control of the Planning Commission. Mr. Dyer, representing the applicant, affirmed that he understood completely the arrangement as applied for. Chairman Antonini wanted to make very certain that this was understood. Upon motion of Commissioner Arnold, seconded by Commissioner Gibbs, and carried, the Public Hearing was closed. UPON MOTION OF COMMISSIONER ARNOLD, AND SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER GARRIGAN, THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. RESOLUTION N0. 818 A resolution of the Planning Co~iasion of the City of Pleasanton recommending to the City Council the granting of Zone Amendment RZ-68-8, filed by Richard K. Taylor. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Pleasanton has considered Zone Amendment Petition RZ-68-8 filed by Richard K. Taylor to amend Zoning Ordinance No. 520 by prezoning to the Planned Unit District a portion of Parcels 0 ~ P, Book 8, Page 75, Township of Pleasanton, or generally that property located at the southwest quadrant of Interstate X580 and Foothill Road and containing more or less 24.8 acres. WHEREAS, said Commission has held a Public Hearing on this petition and has examined the pertinent maps, drawings and documents and finds that the following conditions do exist: 1. That the proposed amendment will not be contrary to the spirit and intent of the General Plan. 2. That the proposed amendment is in the public interest and general welfare. 3. That the proposed amendment creates a more equitable condition for the community than now prevails. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of Pleasanton hereby recommends to the City Council the adoption of an ordinance reclassifying and prezoning said property as petitioned by amending Zoning Ordinance No. 520 and as authorized by Sec. 65859 of the Government Code. - 2 -