My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 89495
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
RES 89495
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2012 4:23:01 PM
Creation date
11/23/1999 12:54:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
12/12/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~ty of Pleasanton <br />Municipal Facifities Master Plan <br /> **"- <br /> <br /> areas of value and potential trail network opportunities. Consideration will be given <br /> to areas where growth is anticipated, and areas now under-served. Also, the plans <br /> and proposals of other a encies such the East Bay Regional Park District and <br /> the LARPD will be consi~;red. as <br /> future sites <br /> Any would be identified generally to <br /> allow for flexibility as development occurs. <br />9. E~ablish Preliminary Parks and Recreation Facilities Needs <br /> <br /> Based on the above analysis (and SGS' demographics data), we would prepare a <br /> draft paper which identifies the City's recreation needs over the next five, ten and <br /> fifteen years and matches these to available opportunities and operations capabilities. <br /> Included would be neighborhood and communc~Ta parks; community fadlities such <br /> as gyms, pools and community centers; Parti r recreation facilities needs such <br /> as sports fields, chiidren's play areas, tennis courts, etc; and general needs for trails <br /> and bikeway connections to existing or proposed regional trails. <br /> <br /> This paper would be presented for staff review and comment. For budgetary <br /> purposes, we assume a paper of 20-30 pa es including various summary tables and <br /> charts, maps of existing and projected fa~i'~ities and other raphic or text information <br /> as needed. The intent of this report is to become a c~apter of the overall City <br /> Public Facilities Master Ran. <br /> <br />70. ~q~t Parameters (O.Dtionai - Not Bud_eeted) <br /> <br /> Develop rough cost estimates for acquisition of land (based on "rule of thumb" land <br /> costs), park development (based on previous City park development costs) and <br /> operations and maintenance (based on City budget review). To the degree possible, <br /> establish the general cost ranges for the proposed plan. Identify sources of funding <br /> (i.e. dedication, ,,in-lieu fees, grants, redevelopment, etc) and their relative <br /> contributions. <br /> <br />11. PriQritie~/CIP List <br /> <br /> Based on discussions with staff and key decision-makers, establish a list of priority <br /> acquisitions, developments, rehabilitation projects, etc which could be integrated into <br /> the City's Capital Improvement Program. <br /> <br /> l Z Draft Master Ptan RePort <br /> <br /> The written and graphic material from Task 9, the priorities from Task 11 and any <br /> f the will be integrated into a conrise Parks and <br /> edits or refinements rom staff review <br /> Recreation Fadlities Master Plan desi ned to stand along or to be included as part <br /> of the overall City Fadlities Master ~;n completed by SGS. <br /> <br />13. Pro. iect Admini~ratiOn and Coordination <br /> <br /> Project Manager and Prindpal would ensure adequate administration and coordination <br /> throughout the study. <br /> <br /> Paee 10 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.