Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton <br /> Municipal Facilities Miter Plan <br /> <br />4, Update the Inventon/ MaD of Current Park and Recreation ResourCef <br /> <br /> Using available inventories, prepare descriptions and tables illustrating parks and <br /> facilities currently available, including those of the City and other providers The City <br /> (or school districts) will need to supply the Consultant with a detailed inventory of <br /> school facilities and their availability for public use. Display existing and planned <br /> park and recreation facilities and trails on a workinl~ map. Identify the existing <br /> programs occurring in the parks and fadlities and review their attendance, types of <br /> users, expressed demands and desires of partidpants, etc <br /> <br />5. Evaluate and Compare Pfeasanton's Park and Recreation Standards and Servi~e <br /> Levels <br /> <br /> Review the City's existing parks and recreation facilities classification system and any <br /> applicable standards such as desired acres per 1,000 persons, service radius and <br /> population sewed goals, development and design standards and other informal or <br /> formal City standards. <br /> <br /> Based on data available in our files and new research, we would investigate the <br /> parks, facilities and service levels provided by other selected jurisdictions who are <br /> "where Pleasanton might want to be" in the next 10 to 15 years. We would survey <br /> at least 6-8 other municipalities or districts (such as Palo Alto, Sunnyvale, Visalia, <br /> etc) identifying their total park acreages (and opulation), the types and quality of <br /> parks and recreation radiities and programs offered (particularly community fadlities <br /> such as pools, gyms, community centers, etc), their standards, their distribution of <br /> facilities, their methods for locating and establishing new fadlities and other relevant <br /> information. Prepare a matrix and brief written text to document this research and <br /> assess how it may apply to Pleasanton. <br /> <br />6. Staff Interviews and Operations Review <br /> <br /> We would interview key parks, planning and maintenance staff members to elicit <br /> information, discuss future opportunities and needs and determine the constraints in <br /> operating and maintaining the City's park and recreation system. Levels of staff and <br /> general costs to operate and maintain radiities will be identified. Up to ten in- <br /> person interviews have been budgeted. <br /> <br />7, Key Informant Telephone Interviews <br /> <br /> Identify key community leaders and leaders of groups actively using facilities or <br /> staff. These individua s (up to 443) <br /> seeking new programs, in consultation with City I <br /> would be contacted by telephone to elitit input on their needs, their opinions on <br /> which areas and community interests are under served, and their desires for future <br /> facilities. <br /> <br />8, Identify and Map Parks, Traii/Bikewav and Recreation O.o.Dortunities <br /> <br /> Our strategy is to avoid detailed maps and text and instead focus immediately on <br /> significant resources and their value for receation. The main work product from this <br /> task would be a composite map identifying possible park or fadlity sites, open space <br /> <br /> <br />