Laserfiche WebLink
BACKGROUND <br />The City of Pleasanton provides a multitude of services to the public, examples of which <br />include police and fire response and protection; library services; and recreational <br />opportunities. The level of service is also highly dependent on the state of the public <br />facilities that are needed to deliver these services. In 1995 and again in 2001 the City <br />hired a consultant to survey the community on the satisfaction with these services and <br />facilities, to determine what facilities and services were lacking in the community and <br />what facilities and services were of a high priority to the Community in the future. This <br />information was helpful to the City Council and Staff in formulating the annual operating <br />budget, the capital improvement program, and other long range planning efforts. The <br />2006/07FY Budget included the funds to undertake a similar survey in 2007. On <br />February 20, 2007, the City hired Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates (FMMA) to <br />conduct the community satisfaction survey on behalf of the City. <br />DISCUSSION <br />The City's Bernal Financing Committee consisting of Council members Thorne and <br />McGovern, the City Manager, the City Attorney, the Director of Finance, and the <br />Economic Development Fiscal Officer worked with staff from FMMA to develop the <br />questions for the survey. The questions were drafted to determine public opinion <br />regarding city services and to develop a "baseline" to determine how these services <br />compared with the results from the 1995 and 2001 community satisfaction surveys. <br />The community satisfaction survey (Survey) was conducted between March 15 and <br />March 19, 2007, with a total of 400 Pleasanton voters being interviewed. Length of <br />residency for respondents ranged from less than five years (17%) to more than ten <br />years (64%). A total of 53% of the respondents were female, while 47% were male. <br />Approximately 84% of the respondents owned their own home and 70% had annual <br />incomes in excess of $100,000. Finally, the survey cooperation rate was viewed as <br />being excellent for this type of survey according to FMMA. As a result of this and other <br />demographic information included in the survey, the consultant concluded that the <br />survey fairly represents the opinions of the community. <br />The survey asks a number of questions regarding City services and resident's <br />perceptions about the City. The following are the overall job ratings by department from <br />the highest to the lowest: <br />^ Park Maintenance - 91 % excellent/good job; 1 % don't know. <br />^ Fire Department - 90% excellent/good job rating; 5% don't <br />know. <br />^ Police Department - 90% excellent/good job rating; 2% don't <br />know. <br />^ Library Services - 85% excellent/good job rating; 7% don't <br />know. <br />^ Sidewalk maintenance - 78% excellent/good job rating; 2% <br />don't know. <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />