My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
09
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
061907
>
09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2007 10:14:45 AM
Creation date
6/15/2007 9:44:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/19/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
09
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PUD-93-02-09M <br />2001 Ruby Hill Boulevard <br />adequately served. The project will contribute to the construction of schools/school facilities <br />through the payment of school impact fees. Police, Fire, Park and related service capacities exist <br />to adequately serve the project and will be mitigated through the design phase of the project to <br />meet the current City development standards. Therefore, this would be aless-than-signitrcant- <br />impact. <br />14. RECREATION <br />Environmental Setting <br />The project site is will not be providing on-site parkland, however, there will be some minor open space <br />amenities to serve the proposed project. <br />Standards of Significance <br />For purposes of this environmental document, an impact is considered significant if the proposed project <br />would: <br />• Result in the failure to meet City standards for the provision of parkland. <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Potentially With Less Than <br />Significant Mitigation Significant No <br />Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br />Recreation <br />Would the project: <br />a) Would the project increase the use of existing <br />neighborhood and regional parks or other <br />recreational facilities such that substantial physical <br />deterioration of the facility would occur or be <br />accelerated? <br />b) Does the project include recreational facilities or <br />require the construction or expansion of recreational <br />facilities which might have an adverse physical effect <br />on the environment? <br />Discussion <br />a-b) The proposed restaurant portion of the project is considered as a destination. It provides activities <br />on site. Outdoor dining hours and other functions would only be allowed for a limited period of time <br />as there would be no exterior lighting or heating lamps installed for these activities. It is unlikely <br />that restaurant patrons would patronize existing recreational facilities. The proposed home site is <br />for a single family residents. If the residents uses the existing recreational facilities, it is unlikely <br />their usage would result in adverse physical effect on the environment. Therefore, there is no <br />impact. <br />15. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC <br />Environmental Setting and Approved projects consist of developments that have final development plan <br />approval from the City but are either not built, under construction, or partially occupied. Approved project <br />25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.