My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
09
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
061907
>
09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2007 10:14:45 AM
Creation date
6/15/2007 9:44:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/19/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
09
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PUD-93-02-09M <br />2001 Ruby Hill Boulevard <br />Therefore, this would be aless-than-significant-impact. <br />e-f) The subject site is located approximately 4.4 miles from the airport, and is not located within the <br />Livermore Airport Master Plan and the subject development will not expose people to excessive <br />noise levels. Therefore, this would be categorized as no-impact. <br />12. POPULATION AND HOUSING <br />Environmental Setting <br />The subject property is surrounded by residential uses. Public streets and utilities including water, storm, <br />and sanitary sewer lines, and gas and electrical lines have been extended to the boundaries of the project <br />area in conjunction with other, nearby development. <br />Standards of Significance <br />For purposes of this environmental document, an impact is considered significant if the proposed project <br />would: <br />• Induce substantial growth that is inconsistent with the approved land use plans in place; <br />• Displace affordable housing. <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Potentially With Less Than <br />Significant Mitigation Significant No <br />Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br />Population and Housin <br />Would the project: <br />a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, <br />either directly (for example, by proposing new homes <br />and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through <br />extension of roads or other infrastructure)? <br />b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, <br />necessitating the construction of replacement <br />housing elsewhere? <br />c) Displace substantial numbers of people, <br />necessitating the construction of replacement <br />housing elsewhere? <br />Discussion <br />a-c) The proposed development is primary a commercial project with no lodging included. The <br />proposed future home site is for asingle-family residence. The proposed development would not <br />result in displacement of existing residents, or there would be displace of housing elsewhere. <br />Therefore, this would be categorized as no-impact. <br />23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.