My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
09
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
061907
>
09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2007 10:14:45 AM
Creation date
6/15/2007 9:44:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/19/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
09
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PUD-93-02-09M <br />2001 Ruby Hill Boulevard <br />Project. A discussion follows each environmental issue identified in the checklist. Included in each <br />discussion are project specific mitigations, which have been incorporated into the project design as a part <br />of the Proposed Project. <br />For this project, the following designations are used: <br />Potentially Significant Impact: An impact that could be significant and for which no mitigation has been <br />identified. If any potentially significant impacts are identified, an EIR must be prepared. <br />Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: An impact that requires mitigation to reduce the <br />impact to aless-than-significant level. <br />Less Than Significant: Any impact that would not be considered significant under CEQA relative to <br />existing standards. <br />No Impact: Any impact that does not apply to the project <br />1. AESTHETICS <br />Environmental Setting <br />The project site is currently occupied by asingle-family residence, three accessory buildings, and <br />vineyards. The site is bounded bysingle-family residential and agricultural uses. <br />Standards of Significance <br />For purposes of this environmental document, an impact is considered significant if the proposed project <br />would: <br />• Substantially alter or degrade the existing visual character or quality of the project site; <br />• Have a substantial effect on a scenic resource; or, <br />• Substantially increase light or glare in the project site or vicinity which would adversely affect day <br />or night time views. <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Potentially With Less Than <br />Significant Mitigation Significant No <br />Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br />Aesthetics <br />Would the project <br />a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic ~ ~ ~X <br />vista? <br />b) Substantially. damage scenic resources, including, ~ ~ ~X <br />but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and <br />historic buildings within a state scenic highway? <br />c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character ~ ~ XD <br />or quality of the site and its surroundings? <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.