My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
09
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
061907
>
09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2007 10:14:45 AM
Creation date
6/15/2007 9:44:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/19/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
09
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PUD-93-02-09M <br />2001 Ruby Hill Boulevard <br />Aesthetics <br />Biological Resources <br />Hazards & Hazardous Materials <br />Mineral Resources <br />Public Services <br />Utilities/Service Systems <br />DETERMINATION: <br />On the basis of this initial evaluation: <br />Agriculture Resources <br />Cultural Resources <br />Air Quality <br />Geology/Soils <br />Hydrology/Water Quality ~ Land Use/Planning <br />Noise ~ Population/Housing <br />Recreation ~ Transportation/Traffic <br />Mandatory Findings of Significance <br />X~ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a <br />NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. <br />find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will <br />not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to <br />by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. <br />I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an <br />ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. <br />I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant <br />unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed <br />in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation <br />measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL <br />IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. <br />I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all <br />potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE <br />DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to <br />that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are <br />imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. <br /> <br /> ~ ~ ~~ <br />Si ure <br />Jenny Soo <br />Printed name <br />IV. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST <br />3-~~~ <br />Date <br />The following checklist contains the environmental checklist form presented in Appendix G of the CEQA <br />Guidelines. The checklist form is used to describe the impacts of the Proposed <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.