My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
09
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
061907
>
09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2007 10:14:45 AM
Creation date
6/15/2007 9:44:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/19/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
09
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION <br />The Planning Commission recommended approval of the application (4-1 vote), subject <br />to the conditions of approval recommended by staff and modified by the Commission. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />1. Find that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment, adopt <br />the draft resolution approving the Negative Declaration as shown in <br />Attachment 4, and find that the project has a de minimus impact on the site's <br />wildlife; <br />2. Find that the proposed major modification to the PUD Development Plan is <br />consistent with the General Plan and the purposes of the PUD Ordinance, make <br />the findings as identified in Attachment 7, and introduce the draft ordinance <br />approving PUD-93-02-09M subject to Exhibit B-1, Conditions of Approval as <br />shown in Attachment 2; and <br />3. Make the Conditional Use Permit findings as stated in Attachment 8 and adopt <br />the draft resolution approving PCUP-182 subject to Exhibit B-2, Conditions of <br />Approval, as shown in Attachment 3. <br />FINANCIAL STATEMENT <br />The proposed project would be responsible to pay fees and the costs of any required <br />utility or infrastructure improvements. The project would incrementally increase the <br />demand for City services and would add sales and property tax revenue. Staff believes <br />that the net fiscal impact to the City resulting from the proposed project would be <br />positive. <br />BACKGROUND <br />The subject site is located within the Ruby Hill Planned Unit Development (PUD-93-02). <br />The overall development was originally approved by Alameda County prior to its <br />annexation to the City of Pleasanton in 1993. Development of the site is subject to the <br />County's planned development conditions of approval, the Ruby Hill Development <br />Agreement, the South Livermore Valley Area Plan policies, and to the Conservation <br />Easement with the Tri-Valley Conservancy. An existing conservation easement limits <br />the amount of land not in grape production to a maximum of 2.5 acres. <br />Existing uses on the site are planted grapes and an existing two-story building previously <br />used as the Ruby Hill sales office. Permitted uses within the 2.5-acre conservation <br />easement include but are not limited to homes, wineries, tasting rooms, restaurants, and <br />lodging. <br />Signatures Properties, Inc. was the developer of Ruby Hill. In February 1994, a building <br />permit was issued for the construction of a two-story building to be used as a temporary <br />sales office and information center for the Ruby Hill development. The access to and <br />from the sales office is via Ruby Hill Boulevard, and the sales office is connected to the <br />City sewer via a private sewer line and private sewer pump located under Ruby Hill <br />Drive. <br />Page 2 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.