Laserfiche WebLink
residences following a collaborative process with the development community Section 17 50 040 <br />of the Pleasanton Munic~al Code requires its use fox building residences." <br />Staff could also add the following footnote to Program 6.2: <br />Section 17.50.040 of the Pleasanton Municipal Code requires use of the Alameda County Waste <br />Management Authority (ACWMA) green-building rating system for new residential construction. <br />50. Please help me understand the meaning of Program 6.5. Who are these professionals and how are <br />we to work with them. Does Planning staff support this program? <br />Periodically, the Planning Department conducts training and feedback sessions regarding green <br />building. Staff is currently implementing Program 6.5 and suggests the following changes to clarify the <br />program: <br />"Continue working with the p~xEe-p~e€esstexa~rstakeholders (architects. engineers, builders. <br />property owners) who implement the Green Building Ordinance to 1•ielfrensure that the review and <br />implementation process atld-of the ordinance isare working as intended. <br />51. Program 7.4, what is a photovoltaic co-op program, where is it currently being done in the Tri-Valley <br />and who finances it? Will this be apart of the consultants report on solar energy that is currently being <br />developed with Livermore? <br />No one is currently operating a photovoltaic co-op program. The basic idea is that people who want <br />to help bring alternative energy to Pleasanton could voluntarily donate a minor amount - e.g. $1 or $2 <br />dollars a month added to their energy bills -that would be used to explore and finance renewable <br />energy sources. The City would not finance this program. The photovoltaic co-op program is not <br />part of the Solar Cities Program with Livermore. <br />52. What is Program 8.3? I don't know what that means so how will a resident understand it? <br />Staff is currently implementing Program 8.3 and suggests the following changes to clarify the program: <br />"Encourage distributed generation which is consistent with the Generator Siting Ordinance. This <br />program would encourage relatively small electrical-generation facilities that could rely on a variety <br />of energy sources such as natural gas, wind. and solar compared to larger facilities that rely almost <br />entirely on diesel fuel. The City snec~ifically targets large businesses to supply their own small <br />electrical-generation facilities." <br />53. Program 9.1; so we will do energy cost impact for every city program? Who does this sort of thing? <br />How expensive is it? Do we have a guideline to follow for this currently? <br />We may wish to handle this in the same way we discuss fiscal impacts in City Council Agenda Reports. <br />That is, as well as discussing the dollar impacts of a new program and/or capital project under <br />consideration by the City Council, we would estimate the energy cost of nmtiitig the program and/or <br />making the improvement. To do this we would need to develop estimates of energy use per square <br />foot of new building, per hour of equipment use, or per vehicle mile, fox example, and then make <br />estimates for each new program on an annualized basis. Some of these estimates may be readily <br />available; others may need some consultant assistance to develop. <br />McGovern's Q&4, Energy Element 9 5/25/2007 <br />