Laserfiche WebLink
4y~,~,saNTOy <br />CITY of PLEAS~NTON <br />~~o <br />.~.:o.-~ Planning Commission <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />DCte : March 11, 1970 <br />Time : s:10 PM <br />fI0C8: Pleasanton Justice Court <br />Commissioner Antonini felt that he would not <br />want to make a decision at this time. <br />Commissioner Gibbs felt that he would be <br />partial to voting for it. <br />(Commissioner Pons was opposed to the strip <br />zoning. <br />Commissioner Pereira felt that he would be <br />opposed to strip zoning on Santa Rita Road, <br />but that perhaps the motion passed by the <br />Chamber of Commerce had some value. He felt <br />that perhaps a PUD method of handling the <br />C-S uses for Western Sierra might be the <br />answer. <br />Chairman Garrigan inquired of the City <br />Attorney if whether under a PUD for a home <br />fair center if the uses could be highly <br />restricted. Mr. Hirst replied that this was <br />possible within limits, but that he did not <br />feel bhe Commission could arbitrarily, under <br />a PUD, accept or reject a specific use. <br />Some further discussion ensued regarding <br />possible amendment of the zoning ordinance <br />to allow C-S uses under a PUD. <br />The City Attorney stated that the Commission <br />,should not discredit the possibility of <br />leaving the district in the "A" District, <br />;and then considering each use as a variance <br />'or conditional use, ratifying the final <br />'zoning at that time. Mr. Hirst expressed <br />'a wish to continue this application to allow <br />.him time to put together a workable solution <br />It was decided to continue this item for <br />two weeks in which time, the applicant's <br />representative, the City Attorney and the <br />Planning Director were to have a meeting to <br />work out a solution. <br />- 3 - <br />