My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 03/11/70
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1970
>
PC 03/11/70
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2017 10:49:32 AM
Creation date
5/2/2007 8:44:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/11/1970
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 03/11/70
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4y~,~,saN~~ <br />CITY of PLEASANTON <br />~~ t <br />~MMjO t-° Planning Commission <br />MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />D Ot8 ; March 11, 1970 <br />Time : a:lo PM <br />PIOCB: Pleasanton Justice Court <br />be beneficial to the area. He also stated <br />the reason he felt more commercial uses <br />should be expanded was because he felt that <br />the downtown area would never realize its <br />full potential as a thriving commercial <br />center. Mr. Corley also assured the Commiss <br />that it was not Western Sierra's intention <br />to ever permit any uses which would be <br />incompatible to the character they are <br />attempting to promote. <br />Chairman Garrigan then read a motion passed <br />at the Pleasanton Chamber of Commerce <br />wherein the Chamber resolved to oppose the <br />C-S zoning for the northwest corner of Santa <br />Rita Road and Valley Avenue, but not oppose <br />the extension of conditional use permit by <br />Western Sierra, and that they are not <br />opposed to P.U.D. for the area." <br />A Mr. Rapp, partner in Essenar Investments, <br />developers of the Amador Center across the <br />street, spoke in opposition of the matter. <br />A Mr. Cole, 333 Mission Drive, expressed <br />concern that there would be too much com- <br />petition from Western Sierra to the uses <br />in existence at the Amador Center. <br />It was explained by Mr. Corley that Western <br />Sierra would not permit themselves to get <br />into a price war because they have a <br />percentage lease on their tenants. <br />There being no further testimony, the Public <br />Hearing was closed. <br />There was much discussion between the <br />Commissioners, regarding the possible <br />screening of the uses before they go in. <br />Considerable thought was also given to <br />permitting certain uses under a P.U.D. <br />- 2 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.