Laserfiche WebLink
4y$~3A1VTo,L <br />CITY of PLEASANTON <br />~ ~~~ • <br />4 <br />~,:o. Planning Commission <br />~rrro ~ <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />D at8 : July 22, 1970 <br />Time : 7:3o PM <br />Place: Pleasanton Justice Court <br />asked if this four-type housing was an <br />experiment. Mr. Frost replied that it had <br />Inot been put together into one cluster yet. <br />I, It was moved by Commissioner Hirst, seconded <br />by Commissioner Pereira, that the Public <br />,Hearing be closed. <br />'ICommissioner Pons stated that all other <br />parcels considered for this type of housing <br />element was much lower in total acreage, and <br />(felt that this large a project was not <br />!desirable and that added open space was also <br />Ineeded. <br />Commissioner Hirst felt there were advan- <br />tages and disadvantages to this particular <br />.housing concept. Mr. Hirst stated it does <br />conform to the General Plan and attempts to <br />have moderate priced housing which we need, <br />the sociology mix is good, it is convenient, <br />and the lower priced housing would be the <br />first under construction. Mr. Hirst felt <br />some of the disadvantages were that there wee <br />too many units, the problem of school was <br />not satisfactorily resolved, there had been <br />no application for HUD 235 money, there was <br />not enough recreational area, no commercial <br />area, only one tot lot, and this would place <br />too large a burden on the sewer plant. <br />Commissioner Pereira stated he felt the <br />general concept was a noble one with variety, <br />but was too massive. The street should be <br />widened to 60 ft., the off-street parking <br />is inadequate, the recreational needs are <br />also inadequate, and there is not enough <br />open space. <br />- 4 - <br />