My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 07/22/70
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1970
>
PC 07/22/70
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2017 10:48:37 AM
Creation date
5/2/2007 8:32:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/22/1970
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 07/22/70
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4y$~gAN~°y CITY of PLEASANTON <br />'~/ • ~ <br />.~ <br />`~~~° Planning Commission <br />~xrsv t <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />~at8 July 22, 1970 <br />Time : 7:3o PM <br />f~~GCB: Pleasanton Justice Court <br />TENTATIVE <br />Tent. Tr.2896, Cont. Tentative Tract ~~2896 - Stoneson Development <br />to August 12,1970. Co. - At the request of the Director of <br />Recreation, this matter was continued to the <br />meeting of August 12, 1970. <br />TENTATIVE SUBDIVIS <br />Tentative Tract ~~3230 (Laguna Vista Estates) Resolution: <br />McKeon Construction - The Planning Director Seconded: <br />advised the Commission that the matter Ayes: <br />before them was the McKeon project to be Noes: <br />built on Foothill Road, and that the only Absent: <br />change being considered at this time is that Abstain: <br />the pm ject will not be a rental one but is <br />being proposed to be sold under the condomi- <br />nium process, and that in order to accomplis <br />that objective, a tentative map is necessary <br />XI IX <br />Tent. Tr. 3230, <br />Approved, Res.No.l <br />The conditions of approval are noted on both <br />the Planning Director's and Public Works <br />reports. The staff had no further comments. <br />A lengthy discussion ensued between the <br />Commissioners as to the desirability of this <br />project being sold as opposed to being rente <br />when first proposed. Commissioner Pereira <br />expressed his opinion that if he had known <br />at the time of the original approval that <br />this was to be sold, his position would have <br />been quite different. Other members also <br />expressed their concern with regard to the <br />sale of these units. <br />The City Attorney advised the Commission <br />there was nothing that could be done under <br />the Subdivision Ordinance if the developer <br />meets the approved requirements. <br />A resolution recommending approval of Tenta- <br />tive Tract flap ~k3230 was entered and passed. <br />x <br />- 13 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.