My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 10/27/70
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1970
>
PC 10/27/70
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2017 10:48:04 AM
Creation date
5/2/2007 8:22:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/27/1970
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 10/27/70
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4y$~sANT°y CITY of PLEASANTON <br />~ '~~ • <br />.~ <br />`~~~° Planning Commission <br />~xx~v s <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />Data ; October 27 , 1970 <br />Time : 8slo PM <br />Place; Pleasanton Justice Court <br />about the future of this hill. <br />Chairman Carrigan did not parti- <br />cularly like the present submittal. <br />Felt the density is still a factor. <br />Commissioner Pons felt a high c~ualit <br />development would be acceptable, but <br />was not certain this was the answer. <br />The Commission then briefly reviewed <br />the previous submittal presented fro <br />C. W. Langeberg and discussion follo <br />on what the recommendations here to <br />him from the Commission at that time <br />before Mr. Langeberg decided to <br />withdraw his application. <br />Some suggestions for the current <br />submittal offered to the applicant w <br />that perhaps a submittal showing the <br />elevations and perhaps a rendering <br />from the floor of Mission Park valle <br />up towards the hill might be desir- <br />able. <br />d <br />e <br />Commissioner Hirst also requested th <br />the applicant tell them if this deve p- <br />ment would be a moderately priced <br />development or a luxury one. <br />The applicant then expressed a <br />willingness to continue this appli- <br />cation following an indication from <br />the Commission as to what guidelines <br />he should follow. <br />The staff was requested to review th <br />minutes and tapes, if necessary, of <br />the meeting of March 11, 1970, when <br />the previous submittal was discussed <br />and guidelines given to Mr. Langeber <br />and report back to the Commission by <br />the November 10 meeting. <br />- 8 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.