Laserfiche WebLink
4~$~sAN~°y CITY o~ PLEASANTON <br />~~; . <br />*~° Planning Commission <br />`~LMtD Z <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />p at@ November 10, 1970 <br />Time : 8:35 PM <br />PIaC@; Pleasanton Justice Court <br />Regarding the proposed C-F zoning at ~k680 an <br />Bernal, Commissioner Hirst felt this would <br />be a realistic zoning, but agreed with Chair <br />man Garrigan that prezoning would be undesir ble. <br />Commissioner Pereira supported the position <br />taken by Chairman Garrigan regarding the <br />proposed C-F zoning. He did not like it. <br />Regarding the area at Foothill Road and <br />Bernal, he supports the position to reduce <br />the C-N and C-C and the 0 Districts. Is not <br />convinced that the RM-25 is the appropriate <br />alternate land use at this point. <br />Vice Chairman Pons concurred with the posi- <br />tion taken by Chairman Garrigan and Commi- <br />sioner Pereira. Regarding the C-N and 0 <br />Districts, would favor a reduction. Regard- <br />ing the RM-25, he would like to reduce that <br />to perhaps the RM-4000. Commissioner Pons <br />expressed a preference for high level duplex s <br />or townhouse units, with the Commission <br />having very strict design review on the <br />development. <br />Commissioner Pereira felt that perhaps the <br />development should go under a P.U.D., so <br />that better controls could be exercised. <br />Commissioner Pons would like to consider <br />each application as it comes in to the City. <br />Advice was asked from the City Attorney on <br />the possibility of imposing a P.U.D. on the <br />area. Discussion followed. <br />A resolution recommending to City Council <br />the adoption of GP-70-4, subject to modifi- <br />cations as noted under Resolution No. 1043, <br />was entered and passed. <br />- 6 - <br />