My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 12/08/70
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1970
>
PC 12/08/70
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2017 10:47:34 AM
Creation date
5/2/2007 8:16:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/8/1970
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 12/08/70
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4y$~sAN~o~ CITY of PLEASANTON <br />~~; . <br />O~ <br />~~° Planning Commission <br />`~pMi9 f <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />~ Gt8 December 8, 1970 <br />Time ; 9:00 PM <br />Pla C8: Pleasanton Justice Court <br />A resolution recommending approval of UP-70- <br />22, was entered and passed. <br />MATTERS FOR Clarifica tion of intentions of Mr. Howard <br />COMMISSION'S REVIEW Neely regarding his six-months interim use <br />of facilities at 4371 Valley Avenue, to <br />liquidate his stock remaining from previous <br />Main Street shop. <br />The staff clarified the position taken by <br />Mr. Neely, who was also present. <br />The conclusion given by the Commission was <br />that Mr. Neely could retain what Christmas <br />orders had already been made, but that no <br />new orders for new stock could be taken, <br />also that no extension of his permit could <br />be given. <br />COMMUNICATIONS Request from MacKay & Somps for one-year ti <br />extension of Tentative Tract #2980, Vintage <br />Hills. <br />This time extension approval appeared to be <br />simply a matter of formality. The staff did <br />not feel there were any problems involved. <br />However, Chairman Garrigan and some of the <br />other Commissioners felt that when time <br />extensions come up for renewal, that that <br />would be the time to take a longer, harder <br />look at the recommendations for approval. <br />Also, a tentative map should be submitted <br />with each request fora time extension. <br />It was the Commission's feeling that these <br />matters should be thoroughly reviewed from <br />now on, rather than perfuntorily granting <br />extensions . <br />This item was then continued to January 26, <br />1971. <br />- 2 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.