My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 01/26/71
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1971
>
PC 01/26/71
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2017 11:42:29 AM
Creation date
4/30/2007 4:54:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/26/1971
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 01/26/71
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
gy~~sAN~oy CITY of PLEASANTON <br />.~, <br />.~ <br />`~~~° Planning Commission <br />rrro ~ <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />Data : January 26, 1971 <br />Time : a:oo PM <br />FIaCe: Pleasanton Justice Court <br />Present to speak for Besco Builders, Inc., <br />were Messrs. Jim Belda and Bob Neilebeck, <br />with their environmental/recreation planner, <br />Mr. Len McVicar of Center for Environmental <br />Design. <br />Mr. Neilebeck indicated that they will be <br />spending $26,000, with an additional $13,000 <br />for trees and landscaping. Total cost for <br />landscaping including trees, recreation <br />facilities and entire open space areas will <br />total nearly $200,000. <br />Mr. Belch spoke next and cited Condition 14 <br />of Resolution No. 1046 incorporated with <br />approval of the tentative map where the <br />developer will be required to pay a fee of <br />$200 in lieu of park dedication per dwelling <br />unit. He felt this would be prohibitive to <br />the homeowner. <br />Considerable discussion followed. <br />It was the general feeling among the <br />Commission that the park and recreational <br />and open space facilities proposed by Besco <br />would not relieve the City of providing othe <br />facilities, nor would it qualify Besco <br />under the Park Dedication Ordinance require- <br />ments for their requested credit. <br />Accordingly, Resolution 1062 was proposed <br />and unanimously adopted denying Besco's <br />request for credit against their park dedi- <br />cation requirements. <br />Situation surrounding the operation of <br />Dr. Carnazzo under the conditions of his <br />permit for an emergency-oriented operation. <br />Neither the doctor nor his attorney could be <br />present and a request was received by the <br />department at 4:00 PM that day requesting a <br />continuance to February 9, 1971. <br />- 3 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.