My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 04/27/71
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1971
>
PC 04/27/71
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2017 11:41:35 AM
Creation date
4/30/2007 4:48:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/27/1971
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 04/27/71
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4y~,~-saNToy <br />CITY of PLEASANTON <br />~ ~'i . <br />,~ <br />~~° Planning Commission <br />~UMi~ S <br />MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />~CtB : April 27, 1971 <br />Time : a:oo PM <br />PIaCe: Pleasanton Justice Court <br />The audience then commented: <br />Mr. Chuck Seymour, 492 San Gabriel Court, <br />had questions regarding the school situation <br />sewer conditions, etc. <br />Mr. Victor Bailey, 4565 Black Avenue, felt <br />that the City is not receiving enough in <br />return for what the developer will be gaini <br />He cited examples to substantiate his posi- <br />tion. <br />Mr. Barry McDonald, 1820 Cortez Court, had <br />questions regarding this subdivision. He <br />concluded his comments by stating that he <br />opposes the application. <br />Commissioner Pereira spoke of the school <br />situation for clarification purposes for <br />Messrs. Seymour and McDonald. He feels the <br />sewer problems have been satisfied per <br />Mr. Campbell's report. He did refer to <br />specific design problems, while cognizant <br />that it was not appropriate at this stage <br />of the application. <br />Commissioner Hirst expressed his concerns, <br />even though he too realized that this appli- <br />cation is still in its tentative stage. He <br />also felt that the applicant should develop <br />the park in the first phase of construction. <br />Reference was also made to the roof material <br />The Acting Secretary stated that he would no <br />support buyer-option to go asphalt shingle <br />unless a percentage is fixed on this. <br />Mr. Aiello also did not support a bike trail <br />along the railroad tracks on the eastern <br />boundary due to possible police problems. <br />But Commissioner Hirst, that the added prob- <br />lems would be worthwhile counterbalanced <br />against the value of a bicycle trail. <br />Commissioner Hirst further elaborated on the <br />Public Works report and also that perhaps a <br />report on the school situation should be <br />submitted by the School District. <br />- 3 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.