PC 12/14/71 - Laserfiche WebLink

4y~~sAN~°~ CITY of PLEASANTON ~ •~/ , ~ ~~~° Planning Commission ~.rrao t MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. D Ot8 December 14, 1971 Time : 8:00 PM PIGCe: Pleasanton Justice Court Planning Commission for further explanation as to the reasons for denial. The City Attorney further responded by advising the Commission that in his opinion the applican has met all of the setback as well as land coverage requirements as specified by the Ordinance. It was finally concluded by all members of the Planning Commission that the reason for denial was not so much based on design considerations as opposed to the density allowances that are presently noted on the property. The City Attorney Chen advised the Commissi~ that in his opinion the Commission has the prerogative to initiate a rezoning to re- classify this property from its present District to a lower density development if so desired by the Planning Commission. He further explained that ib_shduld be that distinction understood between the design process and land use considerations. Commissioner Hirst entered a motion that we recommend to Council that this property be placed in a Study District. This was seconded by Commissioner Pons. This was carried with two ayes, one no and Commissio Pereira abstaining as he was not familiar with the previous decision due to being absent when it was discussed and Chairman Garrigan because of his being a resident of the area. REFERRALS FROM Commissioner Wood expressed approval of the PARK AND RECREATION proposal from the Parks and Recreation Urban Park Policy, Commission. Continued As this matter was not reviewed by the Department of Community Development, it was suggested that this be continued until January so a report could be made on said proposal. - 10 -