PC 02/22/72 - Laserfiche WebLink

4y~~s""~°y CITY of PLEASANTON .~~ o :~M:o,-~ Planning Cor~nmission MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING. DCfe February 22, 1972 Time : s:oo PM Place; Pleasanton Justice Court Mr. Thurman Codell, Augstine Street, did not see any advantage in his parcel being in- volved and stated that he was against it. Mr. Dudley Frost, representing Morrison Homes, asked Mr. Aiello to again explain why the 16 acre parcel known as Creeks Bend was one of the four special problem areas to be considered. This was done. Mr. Frost re- ferred to three parcels: 1) the 16 acres next to Del Valle, 2) three acres across from the school on Black Avenue between Crestline and Harvest and 3) the three acres at Hopyard Road and Black Avenue. Their main concern was that of the Del Valle property. The development plans for that property are progressing. Regarding the other two parcels, the plans have been im- plemented in good faith with the City. They are planned for some type of higher density. Mr. Frost indicated that going into a Study District may be beyond the power of the City to require. Mr. Bernie Mysel, executor of the estate of Ernie Jacobson, referred to the hill property He objected to this property being included in the Study District as it has been studied for the last three years. This was the site of the Tecton application. The Commission explained to him that this property was not studied. Proposals have been submitted for the property, but the Study District would serve another purpose, which is to evaluate the land use for these parcels. If a pro= posal is submitted that met with approval, the Study designation could be lifted. The City Attorney explained that the Study is to accomoda to land use study. One of the purposes is to insure that pending the revie of the land use of the property, a land use proposal inconsistent with the ultimate land use will not be submitted. - 4 -