Laserfiche WebLink
4y~~sA~~°y CITY of PLEASANTON <br />.~ <br />g <br />`~~~° Plannin Commission <br />`~lIM tO ~ <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />D G18 ; February 22, 1972 <br />Time : s:oo PM <br />P~GCB; Pleasanton Justice Court <br />Bother parcels. These four properties were <br />,described as 1) the Vintage Hills area, 2) <br />'..the hill property, also known as the Tecton <br />property, 3) the Brown property (Wallace- <br />Plato application), and 4) the Morrison Home <br />16 acre PUD known as Creeks Bend. <br />Chairman Garrigan declared the public heari <br />opened. The following members of the <br />audience addressed the Commission. <br />Mr. John Corley, Attorney representing <br />Kreske-Myers. He referred to the RM-4000 <br />zoned area located at the end of Del Sol <br />which he identified by Parcel No. 94-19-25. <br />He commented to the Commission that this <br />property was approved as per the rezoning <br />of the convalescent hospital. The balance <br />of that property was left at RM-4000. He <br />felt there has been sufficient study on this <br />property. He also felt that it is unfair to <br />blanket the entire group of properties into <br />a Study District. <br />Mr. C. J. Potts, 367 Mavis Drive, commented <br />on Lot 1, Tract 2537 (Brown property). He <br />feels that the present RM-4000 is spot zoni <br />and he referred to a petition he has circu- <br />lated and submitted to the City Council <br />asking that this zoning be changed. He <br />feels that consideration should be given <br />to make the necessary change on that parti- <br />cular property as a four-plex is out of <br />(character. A duplex would be more in <br />'',keeping with the neighborhood. <br />Mr. Lee Amaral, representing Frank Auf der <br />Maur, referred to the Vineyard Avenue propert <br />adjacent to the Auf der Maur apartments on <br />the north side near Christina Court. Mr. <br />Amaral did not feel that this matter was give <br />any previous evaluation. Chairman Garrigan <br />disagreed and explained that this has been <br />discussed at previous meetings and the reason <br />why such a stud}- district is needed has been <br />previously discussed. <br />- 2 - <br />