My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 03/21/72
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1972
>
PC 03/21/72
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2017 11:46:11 AM
Creation date
4/30/2007 4:23:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/21/1972
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 03/21/72
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4y~~8ANTOy <br />CITY of PLEASANTON <br />,. <br />`~~~° Iannin Commission <br />-~ P g <br />+rrao t <br />SPECIAL <br />MINUTES ~OF ~~ MEETING. <br />Date : March 21, 1972 <br />Time: s:oo P.M. <br />PIOCe; Pleasanton Justice Court <br />Mr. Fairfield further explained that <br />at the time that the rezoning appli- <br />cation is presented, they will be <br />able to have some pretty good detail: <br />as to what they are asking for. The <br />intention at this time will be for <br />C-R zoning. <br />Mr. Avner Naggar, architect for the <br />project, indicated that the first <br />phase development would consist of <br />about three department stores. They <br />plan five major stores. <br />No further questions were forthcomin <br />from the Commission or City staff. <br />Mrs. Rosalie Gassaway, 6218 Garner <br />Court inquired if there would be a <br />theater and offices. This was plan <br />as was grocery stores and other <br />every-day needs . <br />Commissioner Wood asked if it was <br />possible to divulge the names of the <br />major tenants at this time. Mr. <br />Fairfield replied that they would <br />prefer not to do so at this time. <br />The Public Hearing was then closed. <br />Chairman Carrigan then recommended <br />that Stoneson come forward with a <br />site development plan for the <br />Commission's review, and that meeting <br />continue between the staff and develc <br />He also felt that most of the ques- <br />tions would be answered with the <br />presentation of the development plans <br />Commissioner Pons requested more <br />information on the phasing of the <br />development. <br /> <br />r. <br />-5- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.