Laserfiche WebLink
gy~~sAN~oy CITY of PLEASANTON <br />~~ ~~%. <br />.~ <br />~~° Planning Commission <br />~wrto t <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />DG18 : March 28, 1972 <br />Time : 8:00 P.M. <br />PIGCe; Pleasanton Justice Court <br />MATTERS FOR COM- Enforcement of non-conforming sign <br />MISSION'S REVIEW program for the Central Business <br />C.B.D. Signing District. <br />Program, Approved <br />Mr. Castro stated that the departmen <br />is addressing itself to two primary <br />areas, 1) Non-conforming signs, and <br />2) sign violations. <br />He further suggested that a deviation <br />from the ordinance be allowed as he <br />would like to see the applicants in <br />groups of five be invited to appear <br />before the Commission to hear their <br />testimony regarding specific problems <br />with the enforcement of this outline <br />and whether the proposed time-table <br />should not be applied as adopted. <br />He felt that this would be a more <br />equitable way of resolving the over- <br />all problem. It is a sensitive type <br />of enforcement and we should have as <br />much leeway as possible. <br />Motion: <br />Seconded: <br />Ayes: <br />Noes: <br />Abstain: <br />Absent: <br />With regard to sign violations, notic s <br />will be given before the matter is <br />turned over for legal action. Two <br />areas which need further direction <br />are A-board signs and window sign <br />violations. At this time, Mr. Castro <br />displayed some slides of the downtown <br />areas showing various types of sign <br />violations. <br />Chairman Carrigan expressed the feeli g <br />that the Director of Community Dev- <br />elopment present this signing program <br />to the Chamber of Commerce and, with <br />a liaison from the Chamber, an inform 1 <br />contact could be made with merchants <br />informing them of certain violations <br />now being enforced by the City. <br />X <br />-8- <br />